'Til We're Over It Do Us Part

pamdone

First they were, then they weren't, now they definitely are: Pamela Anderson and crap husband Rick Salomon are getting a divorce.

Once again:

Pamela Anderson: 3

Rick Salomon: 3

Monogamous Gays: 0

Jan 4, 2008 · posted by Cord Jefferson, MollyGood · Link · 31 Responses
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Comments (31)

    No. 1 Lily the Pink says:

    As we all know because Mike Huckabee said so, gays are an obvious health risk. Sure, Pam Anderson has Hepatitis C, but she only gives it to heterosexual men…

    That hurt my brain.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:33 am
    No. 2 jujubees says:

    Great. I'm sending back this fondue set, AGAIN. How could he. Pam is a pilar of classiness and decorum. She wears friggin Chanel. CHANEL!

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:42 am
    No. 3 deimos says:

    should i pretend to be shocked or just make a catty comment?

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:43 am
    No. 4 ShiteousStyle says:

    I really thought this one would last too. Sad.

    I just vomited.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:48 am
    No. 5 jujubees says:

    Maybe we could do some kind of smarty pants analysis why this woman has to marry every man she dates? Father issues?

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:48 am
    No. 6 Sugar Magnolia says:

    Maybe 'casue she's a fuckin' idiot?

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:53 am
    No. 7 Lisa#1 says:

    My guess is that because her relationships are predicated upon her looks alone, which she is losing, she is trying to establish some other "bond" to her romantic interest. This bond just happens to be marriage.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:53 am
    No. 8 Lisa#1 says:

    Or, you know, what Sug said.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:54 am
    No. 9 jujubees says:

    And of course the men she chooses is a reflection of how she views herself. It says many, many, many things about that. She's like Peter Pan. But actually it's more like, Slutty Pan. Even though she gets older her men stay younger and skeezy.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:56 am
    No. 10 jujubees says:

    Yeah, fucking idiot pretty much sums it up.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 10:57 am
    No. 11 Sugar Magnolia says:

    'casue = 'cause

    Dammit… Huckabee has me speaking in tongues.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:02 am
    No. 12 janice says:

    She should have just married David Hasselhoff. Why did she fight fate?

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:24 am
    No. 13 deimos says:

    maybe getting married and divorced is her hobby, everybody needs a hobby.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:28 am
    No. 14 Lisa#1 says:

    Or maybe, just maybe, she is a crusader for gay rights. Offering herself up as a prime example of the non-sanctity of marriage. Sacrificing her dignity for the betterment of our society. Throwing herself upon the members of douchebags everywhere to consummate her brave protest. Yeah, that's the ticket.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:35 am
    No. 15 Sugar Magnolia says:

    Good argument Lisa but I'm sticking with the fuckin' idiot thing.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:48 am
    No. 16 janice says:

    Emphasis on the fuckin'.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 11:51 am
    No. 17 alan says:

    silly folks, there are no monogamous gays.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 12:12 pm
    No. 18 janice says:

    silly alan, shut your piehole.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 12:22 pm
    No. 19 Lisa#1 says:

    No, no Janice. I would really like to hear Alan parse that out for me. No monogamous gay males, or all homosexuals? Also, why is that the case? And while you are at it, weigh in on how you perceive gender to play into this point, if you please. Oh, and lastly, is homosexuality nature or nurture? Because I would really like to make sure your conclusion comes from the same argument I have joyfully obliterated so many times before.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 12:30 pm
    No. 20 janice says:

    I guess ignorance is also lazy.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 12:42 pm
    No. 21 Mr. T says:

    Pam's next mate will be four legged and totally with her lifestyle. The nice thing about her next marraige is that she won't have to get divorced, she can just take old glue to the factory for processing.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 1:36 pm
    No. 22 deimos says:

    oh Mr. T, that was so bad it's good.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 1:55 pm
    No. 23 jujubees says:

    Oh man. i thout Alan said there were no monogrammed gays. I would think they loved the monograms. Me too.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 2:28 pm
    No. 24 Katie says:

    Hm, Lisa, as much as I would have loved to see you tell him off, I think it was a joke. Here's another one: since when are humans monogamous?

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 4:57 pm
    No. 25 Lisa#1 says:

    Katie: I thought about that. That is why I asked my questions. I was just going to ask if it was a joke, but I figured I would save a post and write the questions I would have asked if he had said "no." That is what sucks about the internets, loss of verbal queues. Unless you go the whole "/sarcam" route.

    That being said, I may have been a bit aggressive.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 5:26 pm
    No. 26 East Coast Al says:

    That bitch has been riden more than a bicycle. lol

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 6:12 pm
    No. 27 Lisa#1 says:

    To be equal opportunity here:

    Salomon is like a puppy before it is neutered - humping anything he can get his legs around.

    Maybe his next wife will be more to his lifestyle. The good thing is he won't have to get divorced, he can just release her back to her bonobo family.

    Diseased starlets use that bastard more than underpants.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 6:23 pm
    No. 28 blah says:

    I don't think Pam would have this problem if she would just eat some chicken.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 8:10 pm
    No. 29 blah says:

    I thought Alan was being facetious. Is he? Did we get clarification? Damnit, you cannot say something like that and not do a follow up.

    Posted: Jan 4, 2008 at 8:10 pm
    No. 30 Mrs. Fiesty says:

    It makes you wonder what's so sacred about marriage that we can't share it with gay people. Pam's just a dumbass. The mere fact that she married someone who banged Paris says it all.

    Posted: Jan 5, 2008 at 8:10 pm
    No. 31 blah says:

    Forget the fact that gays aren't allowed to get married for a minute - there should be a law that prevents these type of people from marrying. If marriage is in fact a sacred, holy union, why let these douchebags to it so flippantly? Think about it, if you are a shitty driver, eventually you are going to get your license taken away and not be allowed to drive. Same thing should apply to people like this; just take their damn licenses away.

    Posted: Jan 5, 2008 at 9:12 pm
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts