pamdog

Well, this is self-explanatory. The only question I need answered is whether or not zoophilic pornography falls under the same opaque definition as human pornography. Yikes.

There's more.

pamdog1pamdog2pamdog3pamdog4

Jun 22, 2007 · posted by Cord Jefferson, MollyGood · Link · 2 Responses
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Tagged: ,
    Comments (2)

    No. 1 Cha Cha Loca says:

    What's the big deal? After Tommy and Kid, it's just another dog sucking her tits.

    Posted: Jun 22, 2007 at 2:34 pm
    No. 2 evil twin says:

    And she doesn't have feeling in those funbags anymore, so I guess there's no harm. It's not like she can give the dog Hep C, or can she?

    Posted: Jun 22, 2007 at 9:18 pm
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts
    Rumer Has It « Next Prev » Pete Gets Clean