What a Difference Eight Years Makes

Britney Spears has been banned from attending the 2008 Grammys, an inside source told the Daily News. According to the informant, the fallen pop star will not even be allowed to enter the building.

Just eight short years ago, Spears gave the Grammys performance seen above. Watching it is actually kind of sad.

Jan 23, 2008 · Link · 39 Responses
Related Posts

• 01.25.08: Milking the Cash Cow (Comments: 24)
• 01.24.08: Lowest Common Denominators (Comments: 23)
• 01.22.08: (Comments: 2)
• 01.21.08: Spears-Ghalib Breakup Has X17 Excited (Comments: 9)
• 01.21.08: Kelly Osbourne Sells Out Her Friends (Comments: 55)
Comments (39)

No. 1 cooter says:

Sad? Whats sad is she’s actually trying to sing.

Also wow she looks like Jamielynn here.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:30 pm
No. 2 william_crown says:

Maybe in her childhood dream, after her performance the dream her had a nightmare of what her life is like now.

Maybe we are all living in Britney Spears’ childhood dream’s nightmare!

That would certainly explain the last eight years.

WAKE UP CHILDHOOD BRITNEY!!! PLEASE!!!

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:32 pm
No. 3 maria says:

Oh, yea because the Grammy’s are notoriously classy with the guest lists. Pshaw, it’s not like Britney was all Milli Vanilli. Kinda farked up IMHO.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:34 pm
No. 4 janice says:

Yeah, I tend to think banning her is as much of a publicity stunt as having her perform would be. Well, maybe almost.

Ooooh, we’re the Graaaammys, we’re so serious and artsy, now where’s Hannah Montana? She’s scheduled to go on right after Beyonce.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:39 pm
No. 5 lovelee says:

well it just shows she had sane people around her eight years ago

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:39 pm
No. 6 Lisa(#1) says:

Cord, I fucking hate you. I watched that awful pice of shit, waiting for it to be good, so I could think, “oh how sad.” Instead I watched a marginally attractive girl butcher her way through shitty songs while “dancing” the most piss poor excuse for coreography I have seen in a while. Really, dancing suns? Really? That was a cruel joke, mister, and you owe me. Big time. I am thinking sexual favors, but I am not sure yet. Maybe I will sell you to j_b.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 1:40 pm
No. 7 Bodhi says:

Maybe all that vibrato shook her brain lose.

Seriously, who decided that could EVER be construde (sp?) as good singing?

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:03 pm
No. 8 james_boston says:

Nah…I’m over Cord. Sell him to Ju or something…

whoot…that video was rough. Still, congrats to the Grammy peopes for having the courage to kick Brit when she’s down. Way to go jerk-offs! If they had any sense, they’d invite her to perform ’cause you know people would tune in to see that train wreck…now, who’s gonna watch that boring shit, especially since American Idol is back?

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:14 pm
No. 9 jujubees says:

I did feel sad watching this. for the microphone. Did you hear it cry in pain? I did. It was nice to see her in a conservative outfit for once. Remember when this outfit was too risque? Little did we know she’d be flashing us her lady business on a daily basis.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:18 pm
No. 10 james_boston says:

By “conservative”, i assume you meant that she was wearing “panties” “.”

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:20 pm
No. 11 jujubees says:

Of course. Well, maybe not but her box was covered. And she had something covering her legs besides smelly boots.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:36 pm
No. 12 Lisa(#1) says:

j_b: you are right, they should have had her ass perform. Perhaps this exact number we see above? I would bet that heavy drug use would make it better.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:41 pm
No. 13 maria says:

…and smelly fishnet stockings and smelly unnerwears and smelly periods “.”

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:43 pm
No. 14 jujubees says:

Let’s all just be clear, she smells. The whole lot of her. She even said it when Sam was on the phone with Ryan. “I stink”. Yes madam, you do.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 2:57 pm
No. 15 Mr. T says:

It’s a step in the right direction. Now if the media would stop covering this wreckage.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 3:07 pm
No. 16 Sugar Magnolia says:

Even after reading all the comments I still watched the darn thing. There’s 4 minutes of my life I’ll never get back… and I have no one to blame but myself. Dammit!

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 3:15 pm
No. 17 chellelee79 says:

Those were suppose to be suns? Looked more like peacocks to me. Crackhead peacocks in heat that is.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 3:39 pm
No. 18 blah says:

I think if she were to perform, there would have been people who actually watched the Oscars and not just the pre-awards show where Ryan Seacrest kisses thier ass.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 5:29 pm
No. 19 Andrew says:

Isn’t this the year Christina Aguilera totally owned Britney when she won the Best New Artist award?

8 years does make a difference. Britney is now a big mess while Aguilera is on TOP! Like she should be.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 5:35 pm
No. 20 XENU says:

Somebody shoot me… I feel bad for her. Why? I have no idea. I just wish she would wash her hair.. and shower.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 5:36 pm
No. 21 lovelee says:

my feelings for brit brit is dead. no anger, sympathy etc. I see a post about her I skim over it and say mmm.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 5:45 pm
No. 22 jujubees says:

What kind of alien are you Xenu? Can’t you beam this bitch up? Seriously, she’s full of thetans.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 7:41 pm
No. 23 Henny Penny says:

What’s sad is that a whole grip of people tuning in to this performance of hers are buying the idea that she ever had an ounce of talent.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 8:28 pm
No. 24 lysette says:

ugh. that was awful. britney trying to sing live and a ballad at that is laughable. her wobbly voice all off key. the grammys are a complete joke agreeing to feature that no talent. she was, is and apparently will always be crap. that’s her legacy.

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 8:30 pm
No. 25 ilnazhad says:

Um, it’s iniquitous that they banned Britney. I don’t think she was ever talented, but the Grammys are about commerce, not art. Are they forgetting they invited Paris Hilton last year?? They invite people who call others “public school bitches” and “niggers,” and then they pretend they have some standards. Fuck this. This is like the socialite who abandons her real friend because she’s too poor for the in crowd (and it’s shitheads like that who watch this ludicrousness).

Posted: Jan 23, 2008 at 11:14 pm
No. 26 Ruby Jackson says:

That was not her singing in that opening ballad. No way.

Hmmm, yeah, so she was only ever marginally talented, and at least she was trying. She needs to ditch the boots and get back into the platform sneakers.

But really, who cares?

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 12:17 am
No. 27 SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY says:

SO ALL OF U ARE BASHING BRITNEY SPEARS HAH?? DIVAS ARE DONE DUMB CASES WHAT IS GRAMMY ANY???????????? SOME OLD STUPID SHOW 4 SOME BITCHES 2 BITCH AROUND AND SUCK BIG TIME? I REMEMBER XTINA GOING THERE AND HER VOICE DID HORRIBLY THAN THIS BITCH BRITNEY ..YES U WILL BE SHOCK WATCHING THE VIDEO SHE TOYTALLY DIDN’T KNOW HOW 2 GET HER VOICE NOTES UP AND SHE STARTED SCREAMING LIKE A WHORE….ANYWAY U ALL CAN KISS BRITNEY’S BIG ASS SHE SOLD 120 MILLION RECORDS SHE IS TOOOOOOO HUGE 2 BE IN THAT STUPID SHOW KEEP IT BRITNEY UR THE FUCKING DREAM HONEY

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:19 am
No. 28 LOL says:

LOOOL BRITNEY SPEARS IS LAUGHING BY NOW I GUESS DOESZ SHE EVERN CARES GOING TO THAT SHOW? I DON’T EVEN CARE WATCHING THAT SHOW SO HOW ABOUT HER? LOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:20 am
No. 29 dumb shit says:

janice i agree with you..i mean it’s all bullshit maybe it’s just a rumor they would love 2 having that bitch around she always make the show by her name lets all be honest bitches

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:23 am
No. 30 Come My Lady says:

maria what a comment was that?????????? are u an official slutty whore who wakes up every mornin and takes the condom off her tounge???? ur a slut that’s obvious and ur comment shows how a hell of a low person u are go suck on a big cocks slutttt…and 4 everybody else sit on a big black cocks u and ur ”DIVA” show the grandma show that ewwwwwwwwwww in an addition Britney Spears owns u all WORRRRRRRRRD

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:28 am
No. 31 alice says:

that was good her voice is soo good there she shpows alot of her dancing as well i always liked britney and her new CD really rocks she sound great and mature i don’t care about her mess and life whatever all i care about is good music

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:33 am
No. 32 DOOM says:

Andrew yes it is and the following year was the year where britney got 5 awards besides xtina and mariah carey etc..and sold more than 50 records in the same year now xtina has sold around 50 records which is awesome and britney sold about 120 million records which isn’t really good at all haha screw her i love xtina

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:36 am
No. 33 Billy says:

Shame…I would love to see Britty & Amy performing a drug fuelled duet at the Grammy’s …Rock n Roll….

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 3:53 am
No. 34 Billy says:

…crack Rock N Roll me a spliff that is

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 4:01 am
No. 35 Jessica says:

She was NOT singing during Hit Me One Baby One More Time or whatever the hell that song is called. Possibly during the first bit, but i could see her having that prerecorded and edited a bit to make it SEEM like she’s singing. Haha.

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:15 pm
No. 36 jujubees says:

Wow, come on sweety it’s obvious you are 27, 28, and, 30. Take your ritalin and calm down now. We are all sorry you are tone deaf but there is no need to take it out on the rest of us.

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:21 pm
No. 37 stopthemadness says:

juju, it’s obvious that like maria, ur a slut and a whore and u like 2 sit on a big black cocks.

the grandma show sucks, worrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd.

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 2:51 pm
No. 38 Yo says:

So didn’t anyone notice how there was a voice singing at the end, but it obviously wasn’t her? Seriously..check it out. The voice that comes in harmony, and it sounds good and different from Britney’s voice. Am I insane? No, I swear they had someone or something sing for her at the end…

Posted: Jan 24, 2008 at 10:27 pm
No. 39 Jessica says:

Borrowing yet another page from the Madonna play book, Britney Spears has reportedly begun her own record label–Enslaved Records.

Owned by Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Britney’s label is in negotiations to sign its first act.

Hoping to equal the success of Maverick Record’s first cash cow, Alanis Morisette,
Britney’s label is in negotiations with a New York based hard rock band called MEAN VENUS.

Britney allegedly encountered MEAN VENUS mid-set some months ago at NJ’s legendary Stone Pony
(the historic rock club where the likes of Bruce Springsteen cut his teeth)
and offered the MEAN VENUS boys a deal on the spot.

MEAN VENUS’ lead singer (who goes merely by the initial, J)
has also been rumoured to be involved with Mrs. Spears in a more than professional capacity as well.

The MEAN VENUS buzz began with the rumour that lead singer, J, was none other than the illegitimate son of Led zeppelin’s very own Robert Plant
and that the unsigned band would be opening for the long awaited reunion tour commencing summer 2008.

Posted: Jan 25, 2008 at 10:09 am
Leave a Comment
Scroll Posts
The Whole World’s Gone Crazy! « Next Prev »