heididog

She's your fiancee, m'man; you don't have to sneak glances anymore. And if you do, you need to call off that fucking wedding.

Plenty more under here. Look out for her "Girls Gone Wild" bikini.

heidheid2heid3heid4heid5heid6

Aug 2, 2007 · posted by Cord Jefferson, MollyGood · Link · 30 Responses
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Comments (30)

    No. 1 Kitchy says:

    I'm kind of confused by this and wonder if I'm reading it wrong:

    "She’s your fiancee, m’man; you don’t have to sneak glances anymore. And if you do, you need to call off that fucking wedding."

    So if you haven't had a good look at your significant other's goods yet, you shouldn't get married?

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:23 pm
    No. 2 Cord Jefferson, MollyGood says:

    Exactly.
    Best,
    Cord

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:26 pm
    No. 3 Kitchy says:

    Nice.

    My husband and I should file for divorce. Apparently we never should've gotten married.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:31 pm
    No. 4 Cait says:

    Disagree, but to each their own.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:31 pm
    No. 5 Marie says:

    @Kitchy: Yes, you should. Cord is the moral compass of us all.

    I'm not sure who these people are, but my initial impression is 1) They look too young/vain/shallow to be married, and 2) Any sneak peeks he gets at her boobs shouldn't count, because they aren't real anyway.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:33 pm
    No. 6 ruthie says:

    Apparently Cord's never heard the saying "Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?"

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:34 pm
    No. 7 April says:

    i agree but to each their own. im a big "kick the tires" kinda gal… but i think not is a vvalid choice

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:36 pm
    No. 8 Cait says:

    Kitchy, two of my best friends are devoutly Catholic. They've been dating for almost 7 years (they met at the beginning of college, and waited until she finished law school to get engaged), and are getting married in 11 months. I couldn't be prouder of them for sticking to their principles.

    Besides, we all know Heidi and Spencer are a hoax. ;)

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:37 pm
    No. 9 Cait says:

    And Kitch? I was disagreeing with Cord, not you. ;)

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:37 pm
    No. 10 Kitchy says:

    I don't care what anyone else does before marriage, I just think that telling other people they have to have sex and take a test drive first is a pretty closeminded outlook.

    On the plus side, this divorce means that my relationship with Beckham would no longer be adultery. Although he wouldn't qualify for divorce since they did take a test drive prior to marriage. So I guess it still would be adultery.

    *sigh*

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:38 pm
    No. 11 Kitchy says:

    I gotcha, Cait. ;)

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:40 pm
    No. 12 Marie says:

    Life's so unfair, isn't it?

    But is it considered adultry if Beckham's cheating on a robot?

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:41 pm
    No. 13 April says:

    @marie *lol* that was freakin' hilarious

    @ kitch, i think you are absolutely right

    of course, ive made it clear in the past im all for poeple having choices *ahem* gene simmons.

    i think he'd qualify for divorce, when he tesst drove posh she was a different woman, literally (all that work shes had done thier cant be any original body left)

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:44 pm
    No. 14 mister says:

    You know, sometimes if you don't test drive the goods you end up getting a lemon and returning it anyway.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 3:54 pm
    No. 15 Cait says:

    Be that as it may, that is for each person to decide without the moral grandstanding of another.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 4:23 pm
    No. 16 Cheeko says:

    ….and this ia a BLOG. I don't think Cord was giving a speech on morality and premarital sex. Don't we read this blog for the witty insight?

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 4:35 pm
    No. 17 April says:

    wait, Cheeko, is that way you come here?

    crap. I was coming here to use Cord's opinion as a moral guide.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 4:44 pm
    No. 18 Cait says:

    …didn't Cord actually clarify to Kitchy that the intent of this post was exactly that, Cheeko?

    I'm just sayin'…

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 4:50 pm
    No. 19 Cord Jefferson, MollyGood says:

    No, I didn't say that this post was a moral compass. All I did was clarify confusion. Explaining my point is different than proclaiming my point a moral certainty. And can someone show me where I ever wrote "sex" in this post?
    Best,
    Cord

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 4:56 pm
    No. 20 evil twin says:

    The premarital sex was definitely inferred.

    Best,
    evil twin

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:07 pm
    No. 21 Cait says:

    Exactly, Evil.

    Best,
    Cait ;)

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:08 pm
    No. 22 Cheeko says:

    I didn't mean to come off like that. Apologies.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:13 pm
    No. 23 Marie says:

    I read this blog for the "witty insight," but I would argue the witty ingsights are frequently mixed in with moral certainties. I tolerate the latter because I appreciate the wit that much.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:15 pm
    No. 24 evil twin says:

    Me too, Marie. Plus I have such a fun time irking Cord, that I can never stop coming here.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:17 pm
    No. 25 kelli says:

    Actually, the picture, to me, doesn't look like he's trying to "sneak a peak." It just looks like he's either helping or watching her try to surf.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:27 pm
    No. 26 jujubees says:

    He's creeping me out in the picture where he's hosing her off. And the fact that she's wearing a girls gone wild, bikini, uggggggg. Is that and aspiration?

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:32 pm
    No. 27 scandelirious says:

    I'm not quite sure I get the girls gone wild bikini. Perhaps the 'girls gone synthetic' bikinis were all out of stock?

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:41 pm
    No. 28 jujubees says:

    Yeah, I don't see much wildness or boob flashing here.

    Posted: Aug 2, 2007 at 5:45 pm
    No. 29 sweetheart4life says:

    Cord, I think you're hilarious, obvi.

    Posted: Aug 3, 2007 at 9:11 am
    No. 30 Diana Crabtree says:

    Mollygood is the place I always turn to for moral direction.

    I have an arguement against waiting for marriage to have sex. Sex is a great way for a couple to bond and reduce stress and tension, if the sex isn't any good (which will unfortunately be worse for the woman than the man) they wont use this powerful tool, and have more stress in their marriage.

    Knowing how to please a woman is an important trait in a good husband, and a woman is entitled to know what good sex is, and what pleasure she is capable of recieving.

    I am not opposed to people choosing to wait for marriage to have sex, but I am opposed to the idea that that is the ideal choice.

    This comment is dedicated to my married friends who hate eachother, and my ex-boyfriend.

    Posted: Aug 5, 2007 at 7:21 pm
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts