A: The Same Thing That's Wrong with Everything

Most assessments today of last night's presidential debate are grim. Under a picture of Barack Obama and John McCain squared off in Tennessee, the Drudge Report presented a single-word critique: "Boring." Politico is calling it the "worst debate ever."

We beg to differ. Instead, how about worst electorate ever?

CONTINUED »

Oct 8, 2008 · posted by Cord Jefferson, MollyGood · Link · 306 Responses
Related Posts

• 11.20.08: Lowest Common Denominators (Comments: 0)
• 11.20.08: Eat Your Heart Out, Guy Ritchie (Comments: 8)
• 11.20.08: O'Reilly Out to Save SF's White Women from Crazy Blacks (Comments: 15)
• 11.20.08: Britney: 'My Childhood Was Normal, Y'All' (Comments: 1)
• 11.20.08: Grab A Hankie: The Puppy Cam Is Ending (Comments: 6)

Comments (306)

No. 1 evil twin says:

I beg your forgiveness, Cord. I watched the debate on CurrentTV.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 6:35 pm
No. 2 killorn says:

This is classic "If you build it…"

Media scrutiny this election has completely obliterated any hope of thoughtful discourse. Nothing off the cuff, nothing off script, nothing remotely answering a question, just keep your eyes up and message, message, message.

If an authentic moment occurs, it gets ripped to shreds. When the response is to curtail surprise with script, people bitch their faces off.

No one wins in either scenario. But we did kind of ask for it.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 6:39 pm
No. 3 Run-DMS says:

"What philosophy was that, Brooksy?"

I might add that Sarah Palin's deranged perspective is not a philosophy. The words philosophy and Palin go together like paintball and Easter mass.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 6:51 pm
No. 4 Farah says:

as a student of philosophy and future hopefully professor of the area of concentration I will say Sarah Palin is a cunt.
Eloquent and Klassyness, I ooze.
MK at d-listed says we don't use that word enough in daily language so I am furthering his cause.
She is also a douche, arrogent, hate monger, hypocrite, sheep, inbread hillbilly.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:26 pm
No. 5 Farah says:

eloquence i mean
wow i need to take it easy

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:30 pm
No. 6 killorn says:

But why use the c-word (or any other stock neener-neernism) when you could dream up so many new and creative monikers with the fodder Governer Palin doth provides on the daily?

It's not that I am offended by the word, I for one just like to see more cunning linguists work with my daily snark.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:34 pm
No. 7 stopthemadness says:

oh, not this again…

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:40 pm
No. 8 kit says:

Tom Brokaw did a poor job of moderating that debate. He should have stuck to the time constraints, which would have pushed both candidates to give concise answers, instead of letting them ramble on and on and on and on….

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:47 pm
No. 9 parker says:

Farrah, if Palin supported abortion, you'd have a lovefest for her. Based on your idiotic post, before you call another woman a c**t, you might want to take a hard look in the mirror because where you're concerned it appears that the shoe just might fit.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:51 pm
No. 10 killorn says:

The Only Time The Word "Cunt" Was Funny
a short essay by killorn

A few Thanksgivings ago, my Grandparents were down from Ireland for a visit. We all made the trek to Butte, Montana for a slapdash family reunion of sorts over the holiday. It was great - generations of my family from all over the country, gathered together for a Thanksgiving meal.

My Grandfather, a cantankerous old coot, was always best known for spirited language and a hearty debate. He and my Uncle, who had recently grown a beard, were arguing about the state of American politics at the table while everyone was seating themselves. The table grew quiet as we waited for my Grandfather to make the Thanksgiving toast. He rose slowly, looked around at the generations he had spawned proudly, then pointed at my Uncle and shouted in an Irish Brogue "JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE HAIR AROUND YER MOUTH NOW DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO TALK LIKE A CUNT".

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:51 pm
No. 11 jujubees says:

I prefer to say she's a canal leading to the female baby maker.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:53 pm
No. 12 jujubees says:

But cunt would work as well. I just think my description really makes people stop for the moment and really think about it.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:54 pm
No. 13 stopthemadness says:

palin = lady fruit

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:54 pm
No. 14 paperback_writer says:

Please, not another thread dedicated to the use of the word cunt. It's a waste of energy, and clearly a matter of personal opinion.

@ Parker - if Palin supported abortion, I'd still think she was as dumb as a fucking post, with the oratory skills of a two-by-four. Abortion has nothing to do with my blatant disgust with this woman. Her complete inability to admit that she has short-comings, and acknowledge that she has work to do to be up for the job does. Oh, and that whole Russia thing. That pisses me off.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:55 pm
No. 15 killorn says:

parker, there are lots and lots and lots of reasons to dismiss Palin besides her stance on abortion. It's getting one-dimensional up in here.

Also, chastising a person for their use of the c-word by calling them a c-word? Come on nawh.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:56 pm
No. 16 TangerineSpeedo says:

You also spelled arrogant wrong - I noticed because, well, I am arrogant. As a student of philosophy maybe you could break down your use of the word "cunt" and explain it form the perspective of Foucault, Derrida and then how Irigaray may take it a step further in its pertinent connection to feminism.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:56 pm
No. 17 Huh says:

The debate sucked!! How can these be the two canidates? I think I would rather Biden be running on the top ticket.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:56 pm
No. 18 killorn says:

PS this thread is now dedicated to the blinding shininess of Joe Biden's Chiclet grill.

Busey oughtta sue.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 pm
No. 19 mae says:

cunt!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 pm
No. 20 mae says:

i mean first!!!!11

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 pm
No. 21 paperback_writer says:

Is it just me, or does Biden look like the kind of guy that might make a dirty joke when no one was listening?

I love me a dirty ol' man.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 7:58 pm
No. 22 killorn says:

Oh my god, this thread is hitting all of the high notes. Education puffy-chestedness, corrected spelling, the c-word. All we're missing is YOU PEOPLE, running scared, and someone calling someone a "looser" with no life. Am I missing anything?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:00 pm
No. 23 mae says:

we're missing more !!!!!!!!!111111

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:01 pm
No. 24 mae says:

oh, and "you're an idiot."

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:02 pm
No. 25 stopthemadness says:

in the (paraphrased) words of louis c.k.:

"cunt is supposed to mean vagina which i don't think works at all because vaginas are little pretty things with flowery lips. i hear a piccolo in my head every time i see a vagina. even 'vagina' is to harsh…. they should be called a 'fa la la la la tra la la.' there should be a butterfly floating around every vagina all the time. how do you look at something that pretty and say 'that's a cunt!'?"

"maybe if it was a giant vagina and it was attacking a town and throwing buses around or knocking over telephone poles. then you can say 'SOMEBODY SHOOT THAT CUNT WITH A BAZOOKA!! IT'S ABOUT TO STEP ON THEN CANDY STORE!!!"

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:02 pm
No. 26 killorn says:

Joe Biden is a total butt feeler. You can see it in his smile. The Bob doesn't fall far from the Barker, if you smell what I am winking at.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:02 pm
No. 27 mae says:

oh, and SARAH PALINN IS TEH GREAT! U R ALL JELLIS !!111122@!one//!!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:02 pm
No. 28 mae says:

and…

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 29 paperback_writer says:

I am Canadian. I cannot vote in your pending election. We are in the midst of our own election at the moment, but yours is much more interesting (and consequential). I have a question…

How can ANYONE think that McCain/Palin's promises of "change" and "different" have any merit? Bush has been in office for 20 years. McCain has been in office since dinosaurs roamed the earth in roughly 1845 (as per Palin). Where is the change? Isn't it ridiculous for Palin to say that they're going to get all mavericky in Washington? What, against the dudes that have been there for eight years, and would be there for another four? What of McCain's nature suggests that he's going to go in and smash shit up? Further, I can't understand why Americans don't see that change is NECESSARY. I'm so very, very confused.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 30 stopthemadness says:

killorn you're a looser! why don't you go back to africa!?

(wait, isn't this the marcus garvey thread?)

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 31 mae says:

all your base are belong to us.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 32 killorn says:

I think you mean "your an idiot"

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 33 mae says:

and we're also missing a certain canadian teenager's know-it-all-isms.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:03 pm
No. 34 stopthemadness says:

*too harsh

*the candy store.

suck it.

winks!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:04 pm
No. 35 killorn says:

quick, someone bring up race! And how democrats are poor and dirty.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:05 pm
No. 36 paperback_writer says:

@ Killorn - you are very, very right. Strangely, I don't think I'd mind if he felt my butt. I think I'd feel rather honoured. Old dudes can get away with that stuff. If McCain grabbed my ass, though, I'd poke him in the eyeball.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:05 pm
No. 37 stopthemadness says:

your a retarded looser?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:05 pm
No. 38 TangerineSpeedo says:

You mean you guys didn't get my wink and nod to Irigaray's "The Speculum of the Other Woman"?

I also placed the "?" outside of my quotes in the English style - anyone wish to discuss?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:06 pm
No. 39 killorn says:

Joe Biden seduced me with his eyes during the debate. I ain't gon lie.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:06 pm
No. 40 paperback_writer says:

@ TangerineSpeedo - is there any other place for a question mark???

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:07 pm
No. 41 killorn says:

OMGZ TANGERINE WINSZ BRAINS TROPHY

I do not care for irigaray. Can't trust all those vowels.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:07 pm
No. 42 paperback_writer says:

Speculum is the most disturbing of all words in the entirety of the English language.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:09 pm
No. 43 killorn says:

I see your speculum and I raise you a moist

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:10 pm
No. 44 TangerineSpeedo says:

Too many years under the yoke of the Queen, eh "Paperback?" See, Americanized.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:11 pm
No. 45 paperback_writer says:

Well played, killorn, well played. I don't think anything trumps moist.

Except, just maybe…a moist speculum?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:11 pm
No. 46 TangerineSpeedo says:

Speculi are a dish best served moist and warm.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:12 pm
No. 47 sar says:

more like Start The Madness. gahhh, ironick!!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:12 pm
No. 48 mae says:

killorn, that makes me hot.

i think you should probably be listening to "when i think about you, i touch myself" softly in the background during the next debate.

too much? too soon? too much too soon?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:12 pm
No. 49 paperback_writer says:

@ TS - Ewww. That just LOOKS wrong. Also, it doesn't make any sense.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:12 pm
No. 50 mae says:

PANTIES TRUMPS MOIST! gout is pretty bad too, so is period.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:13 pm
No. 51 killorn says:

oh oh!!! This thread could also use some "SOME OF US actually have work to do", which could be used in conjunction with "you looser" or "YOU PEOPLE are running scared"

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:14 pm
No. 52 paperback_writer says:

I have a problem with goiter, though it's fallen out of common usage.

And boil…as in carbuncle, not the pot of water variety.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:14 pm
No. 53 killorn says:

and for extra credit, a tangental rant about how the mexicans are stealing our social security

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:15 pm
No. 54 sar says:

@ the speculum-talk –

i wasnt terrified by this word until a few months ago when i was alone at duck in the shady Big Lots, in the cheapo shopping center - you know the one I mean, with the grocery store that sells dented cans at a discount.

i think this dude has been watching my ass for about 4 aisles - and i mean watching my literal ass - and in the kitchenwares he says "excuse me. do you know the difference between a spatula and a speculum."

what?? i mean, what? now wary of : the word speculum, crazy bum lookers, big lots, kitchenwares, and cheap pillows since i was buying one on that trip.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:15 pm
No. 55 paperback_writer says:

@ sar - I've been terrified by the word speculum since my first encounter with one. I think the US government should direct 700 billion dollars toward developing a less terrifying instrument of lady-part inspection.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:17 pm
No. 56 sar says:

hahaha dusk. i was alone at dusk.

ALONE AT DUCK i am cracking up at my own looserness.

killorn good call on "YOU PEOPLE are running scared" - you have an eagle eye for nonsense comments.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:17 pm
No. 57 killorn says:

"live in Illinois, and I will not vote for that bastard Obama, McCain has sacrificed a lot for this country and cares for it, unlike that two face Muslim asshole!! I want a change too but not him!!"

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:18 pm
No. 58 killorn says:

"Yeah obama's the one connected with slum lords, and was only a christian before running for offices. Before that he was muslim, and prolly still is. Screw obama and reverend wright. And all the scum associates of him. Hes just a big puppet."

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:22 pm
No. 59 jujubees says:

I only want my lady parts inspected with something that has pearls and a remote control.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 pm
No. 60 paperback_writer says:

I like puppets. And muppets, incidentally. Anyone ever seen Mr. Dressup? Casey and Finnegan ruled my world. Please YouTube, if you've not seen this…a cornerstone of my (and many Canadians') childhood(s).

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 pm
No. 61 killorn says:

"Do you think a moron can hold an office? No they are actually smart you just disagree with them because they know how to seek their own interests. In the end of a day they get what they want while you don't. See that is the problem we face. Smart people are those who have bread to eat at the end of the day even though they might look stupid to you."

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 pm
No. 62 paperback_writer says:

@ jujubees - Cindy McCain while watching the home shopping network????

Gross.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:25 pm
No. 63 jujubees says:

Obama also kills babies of the human and deer variety. Plus, I once saw him punch a litter of puppies with one punch. Three stooges style.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 pm
No. 64 stopthemadness says:

@ Killorn who said "I do not care for irigaray. Can't trust all those vowels."

i feel the same way about aioli.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:26 pm
No. 65 jujubees says:

paperback. You say that like it's a bad thing. How else can you make watching Suzanne Somers and Joan Rivers bearable? But I gots to have my 3 layers gold plated necklace and bedazzled thigh master.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:27 pm
No. 66 stopthemadness says:

TS, you're cracking me up.

on the realz.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:28 pm
No. 67 Cait says:

But what about white wine-lemon pepper aioli?

No?

::slinks back into cave, head hung low::

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:28 pm
No. 68 killorn says:

"You bitches wanted a woman? Hillary? Here's one - Palin! Now chew on that before you consider backing a woman again."

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:29 pm
No. 69 killorn says:

I am going to the store to buy wine.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:30 pm
No. 70 stopthemadness says:

Franzia? Wine in a cunt?

HEY-OOOO!!!!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:31 pm
No. 71 paperback_writer says:

Cindy McCain all up in your lady parts makes watching Joan Rivers bearable???

You ARE weird!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:32 pm
No. 72 jujubees says:

Let's talk about gay marriage. I've seen a few out around town so I'm ok with them. But they shouldn't be allowed to marry then cheat with their next door neighbors and participate in swinging. That's only for a man and a woman. Let's protect the sanctity of marriage and keep it wholesome.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:34 pm
No. 73 sar says:

Suzanne Somers should make a sex tape. I need to know what she knows. I just get that sense about her. SEX PANTHER. 60% of the time, works every thigh.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:35 pm
No. 74 jujubees says:

Oh, I misunderstood your response. I was talking about my friend jack.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:35 pm
No. 75 Cait says:

Franzia is so 1992. ;)

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:35 pm
No. 76 paperback_writer says:

I have to leave now, but I want to say…I really do love all y'all. I wish that I had more opportunity to post, but work frowns upon that. Hopefully I can post more moving forward, and I really want to be one of the cool kids…I'm an insecure commentor. It's a problem.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:36 pm
No. 77 sar says:

If The Gays are allowed to get married I am moving to Canada. At least there are no muslins running that continint.

Allso, I don't want The Gays ending up in the key club in our cul-de-sec because gross who wants their husband sleeping with a dude again.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:37 pm
No. 78 sar says:

i like you bunches, pw :)

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:38 pm
No. 79 jujubees says:

I know, right! Once is enough for those kind of tom foolery. That was the other dudes name. Tom Ass Foolery

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:38 pm
No. 80 Cait says:

Sar, I must agree with previous comments about your crumbnificentnessitude.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:39 pm
No. 81 stopthemadness says:

Sar, i'm peeing inside.

PEEING, i say.

paperback_writer, you ARE a cool kid.

i need a clean up for the pee.

who do i call for that sort of thing?

anyone who says ghostbusters gets one in the face.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:43 pm
No. 82 jujubees says:

You're crumbeliveable

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:43 pm
No. 83 jujubees says:

Your so mean STM. Not only do they do a fine ectoplasm clean up but they are masters at getting out the piss and blood. Don't ask why I have ectoplasm, blood, and piss on my carpets.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:45 pm
No. 84 sar says:

aaaawwwwww thanks! you know i couldnt say anything funny without you girls reaffirming me every ten minutes, that's what's up. insecurity FTW!

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:53 pm
No. 85 killorn says:

In the spirit of this thread I bought a sixer of PBR tallboys. I found myself having to stifle the words "CUNT" "FAGGOT" and "JEW" from leaping out of my mouth as I was rung up. The cashier asked how my day was, and I replied by asking him his thoughts on the abolitionist movement, and on the increasingly separate and distinct women’s rights movement, belonging to Quakers. He was all "HUH" so I was all "You know Lucretia Mott, the Grimké sisters, who won the right for women to speak in public, the indefatigable Susan B. Anthony, and astronomer Maria Mitchell, who so opposed slavery she gave up wearing cotton"? And he was all DER so I shouted "YOU POOR, DIRTY LIBERAL" and ran out into the streets.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:54 pm
No. 86 stopthemadness says:

killorn you're the wind beneath my other wing.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:55 pm
No. 87 stopthemadness says:

totally, sar. we're a circle jerk of hilarity here on the daughters and (sons) of mollygood.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:55 pm
No. 88 killorn says:

see here, what we did? we done turned this boat around.

When life gives you lemons, you FIND A NEW GOD

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:59 pm
No. 89 jemms says:

where does one begin?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 8:59 pm
No. 90 killorn says:

oh, give it a shot. The night is young and sober yet.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 9:08 pm
No. 91 jujubees says:

Really? My night is kind of tipsy and it's burps smell like beer. Surfferage KICKS ASS. Who wants to start the bra burning?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 9:18 pm
No. 92 killorn says:

I am going to hold off on crushing this beer can on my head until Jemms gives this post the what-for.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 9:24 pm
No. 93 sar says:

I was about to hi five you for the Lucretia Mott and Grimke(accent ague) Sisters, when the phone rang. It was my mans and them looking for a hot dinner to be on the coffee table at 8:30 sharp, which I promptly ran out to purchase.

But hi five on them anyway. I have to go now because I think it's 1950. Not because I'm an oppressed woman, but because I think I see Buddy Holly on my TV set.

Oh my god no it's LeeAnn.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 9:25 pm
No. 94 killorn says:

all of these beer cans and nowhere to crush them. Jemms, you have let me down for the last time.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:09 pm
No. 95 Chelsea says:

Oh lordie you hags have me crying. Crying! I'm glad I wasn't here to comment though because I'd be woefully inadequate. That being said, the following words are on my NEVER to be said list (typing is okay apparently):

Panties
Speculum
Fetus
Placenta

My sister just had a baby and you'd be shocked, SHOCKED, to know how often people say these words

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:12 pm
No. 96 killorn says:

Isn't it funny how the icky words are all things associated with female anatomy? Just sayin'

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:14 pm
No. 97 Chelsea says:

Yeah, tell me about it. I've already told my fiancee–when we have kids I'm giving the doctor this list (and I don't care if the child is halfway out of me), if he says any of those words I'm demanding a new doctor. I don't fuck around.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:18 pm
No. 98 Chelsea says:

Also, lady parts are called 'inappropriates'. I find that everyone understands me without me having to say anything disgusting.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:19 pm
No. 99 Captain Obvious says:

No. 6. Screw Pallin. I've got some good ones for Cindy McCain:

"Caked up and cracked out!".

"Man stealing, pill popping, puss oozing harpy."

"Shit sniffing (hubby's undies), depends licking, Vicodin popping Republican slag."

"Microphone sucking, venom spewing shit for brains."

The C word works too :)

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:20 pm
No. 100 killorn says:

MOIST PUS

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:43 pm
No. 101 jujubees says:

MOIST PUSS PANTIES. My eyes just vomited.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:47 pm
No. 102 Alice says:

Wait a second … I was supposedly an ignorant bastard for calling Palin a cunt. Seems like it's relatively ok now …

Sigh …

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:57 pm
No. 103 poo says:

#88, killorn:

When life gives you lemons, make lemonade.

When life gives you salmon, make salmonella.

When likfe gives you crap… never mind.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 10:59 pm
No. 104 poo says:

Sounds like there's more liquor in this thread than in all seven years of my entire college career.

Im totaly jellus.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:03 pm
No. 105 Captain Obvious says:

I can't afford the good shit like you ELITISTS. It's good old "Rolling Rock'. Only the asshole liquor store owner tried to overcharge me. I will not tell you his nationality 'cause I AM NOT A BIGOT! I will tell you, however, that every time you mention the word "Intifada" to him, his tongue starts clicking in the most rapid and unusual way.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:09 pm
No. 106 Stoney says:

I'm so glad you brought this up. I have yet to read the other comments in this thread, but I was very much repulsed upon viewing the latest Drudge headlines. His bias is totally transparent.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:21 pm
No. 107 paperback_writer says:

I just saw Religulous I'm sad, for all kinds of different people. This is my sad face - -. Yep, that was it.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm
No. 108 paperback_writer says:

I missed an "and" in there somewhere. Drats.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm
No. 109 stopthemadness says:

chelsea, i laughed right OL at no. 95.

ha!

when life gives me lemons, i just stick them in my bra. sure, they make my dirty pillows look a little misshapen, but in this economy, who can afford a proper boob job?

(the little nubbin on the end of lemons doubles quite nicely as a nipple. just sayin'.)

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:41 pm
No. 110 paperback_writer says:

Dirty pillows? I prefer the trashtastic "fun bags".

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:43 pm
No. 111 stopthemadness says:

ooh paperback, i want to see that THIS bad.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:45 pm
No. 112 stopthemadness says:

dirty pillows a la piper laurie in carrie.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:46 pm
No. 113 paperback_writer says:

Oooh! What a reference!

Yeah, it was a pretty alright flick. Dude is a bit of a jackass, but he always has been. Mostly, I just feel scared and sad, and I'm afraid to be alone. I want someone to hold me, because the world is going to end…and it ain't gonna be pretty, and it's going to be due to intolerance and craziness on ALLLLLLL sides.

Why oh WHY can't we all just get along?

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:50 pm
No. 114 paperback_writer says:

There's a former Canadian PM, Pierre Trudeau, who once said (I'm paraphrasing) - the government has no place in the bedrooms of our nation. I'd like to extend that sentiment to - religion has no place BUT in the bedrooms of our nation. Reglious folk, or athiests, or agnostics…we all need to keep that shit to ourselves.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:53 pm
No. 115 stopthemadness says:

because if we all got along, i would have no one to kill in the face.

sad but true.

bill maher was on the daily show last week and he was hilarious. really quite funny. but yes, a bit of an ass,jack.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:54 pm
No. 116 paperback_writer says:

You could kill penguins in the face. They're terrifying. We need to focus our rage on them.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:57 pm
No. 117 Cait says:

He aiolied Supahead.

True story.

Posted: Oct 8, 2008 at 11:58 pm
No. 118 killorn says:

pb, I would be curious to hear your take on religulous. Click on my name and email me? We can become besties!

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 12:12 am
No. 119 killorn says:

PS, color me jumping the gun, but I think I smell a wedding in the future for Stoney & Captain Obvious. Wheeee!!!

So will it be Captain Stoneyus or Stoney Obvious?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 12:18 am
No. 120 Cait says:

I watched Maher's HBO rantfest a coupla weeks back, and he kept going on and on about how stupid people who believe in God are.

That was frustrating.

I remember "Politically Incorrect" back in the day - Maher was GREAT at creating discourse, whether liberal, conservative, or Tombalicious.

Now he's just a sad, smug, bitter little man…

…who fucks people famous for giving exquisitely moist head.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 12:26 am
No. 121 Cait says:

I'm also pretty sure I heard a dirty rumor that Maher has a speculum mounted in his vajayjay panties.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 12:30 am
No. 122 sar says:

None of these words bother me. Moist. Used. Alveoli or whatever you guys are saying.

Moist makes me think of a delicious duncan hines cake that i can smash with a fork and subsequently eat from the bottom side of said stuck fork.

I do remember a guy in college trying to make me say "genitals" and being totally icked.

Words that I avoid saying:
Rape
Rigger/Chigger/Other almost-slur sounds
Siemens (why would you name your company that)
and other names for what siemens reminds me of
Gonads

That's enough for tonight. Tomorrow we'll start the next chapter - words and suggestions that make me want to hork. We'll start with circus peanuts and gummy orange slices move all the way to words that remind me of those things, like MMA fighter Kimbo Slice.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 1:29 am
No. 123 Matt says:

About the Sarah Palin thing, yes, it's true she didnt answer the questions directly, she took a indirect approach and said the things the people would want to hear, she got up there and attempted to 'sell' if you will, the McCain/Palin campaign. Now, according to dems she is a idiot and she cant answer questions correctly. According to me she took advantage of her time up there to spread her message about things the American should care about.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 8:07 am
No. 124 Chelsea says:

Oh, sigh. Here we were having a totally off tangent conversation about gross words and Matt had to come in and bring us back on point.

Here's the thing Matt–After the first debate, both side (but more McCain) got flack for sticking to talking points and not really answering questions. Then of course jump forward and we all know they did it again in the second debate. The point is, you'd think that after seeing the criticisms the candidates were getting for that, Palin would have tried to do what she said she was going to do– speak straight to the American people, and whoever Joe Six Pack is. She didn't do that at all, and sicne she IS inexperienced it was a critical error because it made it seem that she didn't have any answers for the questions, not that she wanted to 'sell'.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 8:38 am
No. 125 Chelsea says:

And yes, I know that was just a giant hodgepodge of run-on sentences towards the end. Sometimes I use commas as a crutch

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 8:38 am
No. 126 Chelsea says:

Alright, so third post in a row with no one else commenting. But still, I must…

Matt–saw your comment from yesterday when you tried to defend yourself about being a jackass. And yes, you are a jackass for spelling Towson wrong. It's not like you went to a school with some long verbose name. It's six letters. And it wasn't the word police that got on you, it was the credibility police. You haven't had a whole lot of spelling errors here so it certainly makes me wonder if you really went to Towson if you can't even spell it. But hey, what do I know. Anyway, PLEASE go back to anncoulter.com or whatever the hell fark.com is. I didn't even know those sites existed, but since you do I really think it's funny you said you weren't 100% for McCain. Of course someone like you is. Oh, and since you're still saying most democrats are uneducated I want a link that proves that before you say anything else. If you've got time to post, you've got time to validate your assertions.

And since I'm sure you'll call me an idiot and we'll have lots more fun later, I'll leave it at that.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 8:48 am
No. 127 paperback_writer says:

@ Killorn - email summary of my thoughts forthcoming. Gonna draft this morning, in between bouts of actually getting something done at work (in these hard economic times, doing crap all at work hardly seems reasonable!)

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:05 am
No. 128 paperback_writer says: Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:33 am
No. 129 Matt says:

Chelsea, your retarded, it was a typo. If you think spelling something wrong 'by mistake' makes someone a jackass then you are a jackass and have no room to talk.

Link 1 - http://www.sodahead.com/question/49354/?page=3 - Hilary Clinton a DEM had higher uneducated, lower class support than Obama. Now just to keep you on point, I didnt say most Obama supports were uneducated lower class, I said most DEMS were.

Link 2 - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....330288.ece - Again this article states that most Clinton (who is DEM) supporters were lower class.

Now we can look at other facts, that one should be smart enough to know with out having to read some link on the internet. The Democratic party has a high rate of black, spanish/latino, immigrant or general minority following. It also a known fact that the majority of people falling in those categories are considered lower class. You guys are beating a dead horse here. Just because alot of the democrats out there fall in that category doesnt mean you do…get over it.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:44 am
No. 130 Matt says:

paperback - Good article. Im not denying that Palin has her issues.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:46 am
No. 131 Chelsea says:

First of all Matt, you mean to say YOU'RE retarded. There's nothing funnier to me than being called retarded by someone who can't learn basic contractions.

Anyway, explain to me how splitting up support between two democrats adds any validity to your argument. Because one democrat got more of the lower class support than the other democrat means that most democrats are lower class? What? It makes my brain hurt to even try to understand your logic. If I turned that around and said that McCain received more lower class support than Huckabee or Romney or whoever, does that mean most Republicans are lower class? No? Oh, I didn't think so. And also, how does one get smart in your world without verifying facts? I should know better than having to follow a link, sure. But it's much easier to do that than to have you point me in the right direction at the Library of Congress, so you'll have to amuse us here. Blindly following what an anonymous person tells you is what FOX News viewers do, not intelligent people.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:57 am
No. 132 Chelsea says:

And before you point it out again, I'm not getting defensive because I think you're calling me lower class. I know that I'm not (gotta love the government jobs!) but it's your lack of credibility or facts to back up the statement that has me confused.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 9:58 am
No. 133 sar says:

"Chelsea, your retarded, it was a typo."

Ohhh I hope to xenu that was ironic.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:08 am
No. 134 Matt says:

Chelsea - It's common knowledge that Democrats have largely been made up of lower class people, it's just a fact. It makes MY brain hurt that you NEED to read something to prove that to you. It's also derived that most lower class people are less eductated than middle/upper class. Govt. job eh? that explains why you spend so much time on the boards.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:11 am
No. 135 Matt says:

Wonderful now we have a cultist on the board.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:11 am
No. 136 Chelsea says:

It sure does, I make no bones about that. government job = time to kill.

Why would it be shocking that I don't take things I don't believe at face value? There are TONS of lower class Republicans, and others have offered statistics of that, so why do you not have proof?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:12 am
No. 137 Matt says:

Oh shit..I made another typo on the word educated two posts up. Hang me from the cross.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:13 am
No. 138 sar says:

Yes I'm a brand new addition, surprise! Hope my dianetics doesn't spill onto your thetans when we're bumping around in here!

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:13 am
No. 139 Lisa (#1) says:

Dooooood! I can't believe I missed this last night! This was a righteous thread.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:17 am
No. 140 Matt says:

Oh dont worry. Someone that believes a bunch of aliens crash landed in DC10's and lost their souls on the planet has no influence on me.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:17 am
No. 141 Lisa (#1) says:

What is the import of the Dems mostly being lower class? I don't want to wade through these threads. Anyone? Bueller?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:19 am
No. 142 Matt says:

Chelsea - http://people-press.org/commentary/?analysisid=95

Please scroll down to the table titled "Party Identification Trend, By Democraphic Groups". That poll includes the last two presidential elections. If that doesnt prove my point I dont know what will.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:20 am
No. 143 Chelsea says:

There isn't any importance. But Matt said that it's common knowledge that most dems are lower class. A few people offered links refuting that (not that there's anything wrong with it) and Matt said I'm retarded for needing proof that he's right.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:20 am
No. 144 paperback_writer says:

@ Matt - a question for you (and I'm being serious)…

What percentage of Americans would be considered "lower class", as per your definition?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:20 am
No. 145 Matt says:

Lisa - There is no importance, I brought it up in one my posts defending McCain and all the dems on the board immediatly took that as a insult and starting going bonkers on me.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:21 am
No. 146 Chelsea says:

I think he already said paper. Under $20k–Am I right Matt?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:23 am
No. 147 Matt says:

Paperback - Id say about 25% would be considered lower class.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:25 am
No. 148 Lisa (#1) says:

Ok, so why bring it up? What is the connotation? What work is it doing in your argument?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:26 am
No. 149 Matt says:

Chelsea - Those making under 20K a year are considered below the poverty line, Id say anything under 30K would be considered lower class.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:26 am
No. 150 Matt says:

Lisa - Im trying to move on…people keep bothering me about links to prove my point. So thats what I did.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:27 am
No. 151 Chelsea says:

Matt: From your same site comes the following

"Liberals have the highest education level of any typology group ­ 49% are college graduates and 26% have some postgraduate education. But the Enterprisers also include a relatively high percentage of college graduates (46%), although fewer Enterprisers than Liberals have attended graduate school (14%).

Pro-Government Conservatives stand out among Republican groups for their modest incomes. About half (49%) have annual household incomes of less than $30,000; just 13% of Enterprisers and 26% of Social Conservatives have incomes in that range. Pro-Government Conservatives' annual household incomes are comparable to those of Disadvantaged Democrats and Bystanders, and much lower than those of other GOP groups.

Huge disparities in education also divide both Democratic and Republican typology groups. Just 13% of Disdvantaged Democrats have completed college (9% college grads, 4% postgraduate), compared with nearly half of Liberals. Educational differences between Liberals and Conservative Democrats are nearly as large (49% vs. 16%)." (http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=945)

It's a bit verbose, and is college instead of income. However, you said that the majority of dems are lower class and the lower class are typical uneducated. ergo, dems are uneducated. Also, yesterday many links were given with opposing data. You might be right, others might be right. I think this goes back to the old saying– 85% of statistics can be made to say whatever you want. Agreed?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:29 am
No. 152 sar says:

Someone drag me out of here before I actually get mad that Matt feels free to judge my well-established and long-held scientologist beliefs.

You obviously didn't get enough barley water as a child, Matt. You know not who you are fucking with.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:30 am
No. 153 paperback_writer says:

I don't have time to review all of the information that you have posted, Matt (I will do so later today when I'm not at work). In the meantime, though, a thought -

Is it possible that those that are lower income are more negatively impacted by government action? You cite Clinton's supporters, and those of Obama - in both cases, were these not Democratic candidates following Republican terms in office? Is it possible that the "lower class" were mobilized for change due to the impact of the prior leaderships? 25% is a pretty significant number, that would make a blip anywhere in terms of support…

Also - I'm not sure that it's fair to equate lower income with uneducated…maybe in terms of formal education, but I think it's a fallacy (and perhaps even arrogant) to say that a lack of formal education makes one unintelligent.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:31 am
No. 154 Lisa (#1) says:

Ok. I get that you are trying to move on (and it was another thread), however, I would still like to know (why bring it up, originally in the other thread? What was the connotation? What work was it doing in your argument?) if you get the chance.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:31 am
No. 155 Chelsea says:

Oh, and sorry for the $20K comment. I thought that's what you'd said and misread paper's question anyway. I'd agree that under $30k would be lower class, though I'm sure that also depends on the geographical location. $30k in like, SW Virginia where I used to live goes way further than $30k in Northern California, you know?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:32 am
No. 156 sar says:

I'm smart-ish and more educated than Matt. And I am very low-income.

I think it's because of my thetans you guys, I'm serious. I need some more money to I can buy some more soul cleansings. Damn this economy, I'll never level now!!!

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:33 am
No. 157 Chelsea says:

You're right paper. We had this argument way back in my college days about the difference between intelligent and educated. I've known many people who are dumb as hell but have a Masters. And a couple who barely scraped out of CC and are wicked smarter. There's examples either way

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:35 am
No. 158 sar says:

pw - woo hoo fallacy! you are the shizzle.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:35 am
No. 159 Chelsea says:

Oh lordie sar. You crazy Scientologists make me smile. Can I get a soul cleansing on the house? I work pretty close to your DC headquarters

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:35 am
No. 160 sar says:

ALL HAIL LORD XENU

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:36 am
No. 161 Captain Obvious says:

Geesh, Matt. i hope McCain is paying you for your comments. I would hate to think you are making an ass of yourself for free. Please, Matt. I know that people make spelling errors all of the time, but could you please keep it to a minimum. I have a hangover, and it hurts my eyes.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:36 am
No. 162 sar says:

Chelsea I joined this religion because extorting money is important to me, don't slap us in the face by trying to keep your money. You may as well be taking Tylenol in front of me.

I don't care if Matt thinks I am a Scientologist but it would bother me if Chelsea did - Chelsea, I'm not.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:38 am
No. 163 Captain Obvious says:

I made a couple in my post. Who'dah thunk?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:39 am
No. 164 Captain Obvious says:

My thetans are torturing me this morning! Xenu? Bring your big ship down here and clean out my plumbing!

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:41 am
No. 165 Chelsea says:

I totally know you're not. I wouldn't talk to you if I thought you were, out of fear you'd brainwash me. Sometimes I'm afraid of odd things, like being brainwashed via internet.

Anyway, I laughed my ass off when Matt called you a cultist.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:41 am
No. 166 Cait says:

Tom-ba shots all around! Praise the Xenu and pass the low-class income hat!

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:45 am
No. 167 Matt says:

Chelsea - I agree with post 151 and 155. No comments there.

Lisa - I believe I brought it up because I got pissed when I defended McCain and all the Obama people on these forums went crazy on me…something along the lines of you "you guys prove the point that most dems are uneducated"

Paperback - So what if the lower class was more impacted? I pay my taxes based off what I make, just like they do. Is it fair that dems want to tax those that make more money? I dont think so, those people wored to get where they are and now they have to pay out the ass because of what they worked to acheive? Bullshit.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:47 am
No. 168 Lisa (#1) says:

I'll leave a little Tom-ba ™ at Rumple's alter.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:48 am
No. 169 Chelsea says:

Well, I guess I feel this way– If you make your money off the backs of the lower class, then when times are hard you can shove it and pay more to bring the economy out of ruin. So yeah, I think it's fair that they pay more.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:51 am
No. 170 Matt says:

They already do pay more many than the rest of us…thats why we have tax brackets. So even though the rich are already required to pay more than everyone else, its still fair to stack more on them?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:55 am
No. 171 Lisa (#1) says:

Oh, I get it - you got upset and then they asked you to prove your assertion? So more of a reaction rather than a point about something.

Here is the thing about money. That 35th K is a whole lot to someone who makes 35K, not so much to someone who makes 250K. Is it really that bad to say, hey, you, go buy an extra box of mac and cheese and I will pay a bit more in taxes? And I feel like "paying out the ass" sort of implies that they are going without. They are not going without.

I feel like there are all these assumptions you make that don't jibe with my personal experience. I work in NY. I will tell you that a barista in Midtown works just as hard, albeit in a different capacity, as a stock broker. And don't think for a minute that a lot of the wealthy weren't born rich, sent to private schools and know no student loans, and got their jobs because of connections. It seems to me that we have vastly different experiences with people. Do I know some lazy asses who didn't work hard in school and make no money? Yep. And some lazy asses who bank? Yep. People who worked hard and make no money? Check. People who worked hard and make oodles? Yessiree. If you want a stronger country, shore up the weakest link. I believe that starts with education, but that is for another time.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 10:57 am
No. 172 paperback_writer says:

@ Matt - I think it's a fundamental disagreement of how society should work. For me, a country should work together to ensure that everyone is as okay as possible, and has access to the same opportunities as those with means. On a personal level, there may be a flavour of socialism. From your perspective, though, look at it this way - a functioning society will have less of a lower class, causing a lesser strain on the resources of the nation. The economy is strengthened, more people can contribute more resources, and those with wealth will be able to acquire more due to the strength of the nation and it's population. Additionally, the nation is stronger on the world stage due to their economic means, and there is less civil discord within the borders. I understand that taxation is a concern for those with wealth, but it's a sort of…short term pain for long term gain? Does that make sense? I'm not sure, it's still early for me. :)

Taxes also fund the things that all demographic groups support - education, infrastructure, defense. More people having more opportunity, and therefore making more money, will mean more wealth for the nation as a whole. Obviously there are people that abuse the system, and that will always be the case. I'm not sure that it's fair to judge an entire segment of the population (by your estimation, 25%) based on the attitudes of what is probably a minimal number of persons.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:01 am
No. 173 Matt says:

Chelsea - if you dont mind me asking what is your grade level?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:01 am
No. 174 Captain Obvious says:

Matt, oh Matt. The rich pay more in taxes, but on a percentage basis they pay less. bush did that. McCain wants to lower the percentage even further. Are you saying you are in favor of a flat tax? You cannot possibly be that foolish. The rich are laughing at thier little lamb, Matt, at his very second.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:03 am
No. 175 Chelsea says:

Bachelors. Yours?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:04 am
No. 176 Matt says:

Chelsea - I have a Bachelors as well..meant your GS payscale.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:06 am
No. 177 Captain Obvious says:

P.S. I know a lot of rich people that didn't work for a goddam thing. They got it thru Parent's connections. So the whole "You will get rich only if you work hard" ideology is crap.

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:07 am
No. 178 Matt says:

C.O. - Do they not pay thier taxes based of off what they make? I pay my taxes based of what I make, when I get a raise, the amount I pay in taxes goes up. So lets say Im one of the rich, I should then have to pay MORE because of I was able to get a good education, get a good job and make a good amount of money?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:08 am
No. 179 Chelsea says:

Dude, I'm terrible with tables (damn you left brain!) but I think based on the DC area I'm a grade 6. However, I'm the first to admit when I don't know what the fuck I'm doing, and this is one of those times. Comments, thoughts?

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:13 am
No. 180 paperback_writer says:

i keep posting, they won't show up…

Posted: Oct 9, 2008 at 11:14 am