Dead Things on Dead Things

Perhaps famous liar Sharon Stone should take "paws" before choosing what to wear to events these days. The angry vegans at PETA are once again enraged with the Basic Instinct flasher and notorious fur lover, who showed to Elton John's Oscar party last night wearing a brooch made of a rat's foot.
Besides being ethically repulsive the brooch is also visually unappealing, but Stone says it's supposed to bring her good luck, meaning she's gross and desperate.
After the jump, a couple more pictures and the truth behind "lucky" furs.
[Source]
Scroll Posts
The Commies « Next — Prev » Is That Contagious?



sharon stone has, is and always will be a tacky bitch. she probably doesn't even like wearing fur, she probably does it just to piss PETA off.
P.S. that is one big fucking rat paw. word.
I think she's just hated animals ever since that komodo dragon tried to eat her husband.
PETA sucks. Sharon sucks too but I love the fact she pretty much gives PETA the finger @ these events.
I have never heard of a lucky rat foot. Considering a have a borderline phobia to all rodents (I'm looking at you evil bunnies!) I can't imagine how this is appealing. It also didn't seem to be all that lucky for the rat so I don't get the connection to good fortune.
Thunderdome battle extraordinaire, Sharon VS Peta. Whoever wins gets to turn the other into a coat or tacky pin.
I'm not a big fan of PETA and I'm not a big fan of Sharon Stone. That rat foot however is wicked creepy. I really wonder how the decision making process went in deciding whether or not to wear it. Or if there were other rodent foot options involved.
I am geared up for that Thunderdome battle.
My money is on Sharon. (Even if Peta brings ALL their members.)
She is a scary evil diva.
I think wearing fur is unethical, but it is as unethical as eating meat (which is also, considering many of our living conditions, only done for pleasure). It's inconsistent that they loathe people who wear fur, but then there is no outburst when people eat meat. Conventionality is not morality.
She just wants you to give her a high five - on the boob. Hey, she's gotta get her kicks where she can. I do think she looks better here than she has in a while - in the face. Not so much with the fashion/fit.
Hey, she gets press (albeit much negative) for it. But I still think of wearing fur as an unnecessary and old-fashioned style, like carrying a bag phone or wearing a girdle. Other options have developed…
Sharon: The exposed belly look is not at all fashionable at age 50, esp. at a dressy event, no matter how fit you are.
It's a grotesque reality we live in, where sick old sluts like Sharon Stone can parade in front of the cameras with entire fur farms hanging from their wilted necks and feel important and attractive. BTW: PETA is not the only org opposing the killing of animals. It also bugs me when people compare food with fashion. Cruelty in the food industry doesn't justify the same in fashion. There is a huge effort from many people to move to more humane ways of raising animals for food. That still doesn't take away the slaughter at the end but at least it improves conditions for the animals. Fur is just mindless decadence.
I kinda like the rat foot. I think it would ward off weirdos…and most other people as well.
ok. IT'S A RAT'S FOOT (a big one)
anyway, IT'S A RAT. a dirty rat with diseases. kill it for all i care.
if it's a tiger paw, then i will take this bitch down. she's so tacky.
IT IS NOT A RAT'S FOOT!!!!! IT'S A SCOTTISH GROUSE FOOT!!! IT'S A TYPE OF BIRD LIKE A QUAIL!!!! SHE IS AN IDIOT AND SO ARE ALL THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP THINKING IT'S A RAT'S FOOT!!!!
The way she likes fur, she should shave her legs and bush, skin and all, put it stole-like around her neck, and hang her sorry-ass self.