Let's Have Another

A New York Post blind item:
Which teenage TV cutie was sharing cocktails with her permissive mom at a fashion party in New York? The mom — who favors short shirts and wears her hair just like her daughter — needs to grow up.
[Source]
Scroll Posts
Portman, Johansson Greatly Deplete Stylist's Hair Product « Next — Prev »



Great another Deana Lohan. T-minus 3 years and counting until Hayden morphs into LiLo.
HP's mom vs. Deana.
Her name is Deana right?
that explains the beer belly
Beer belly, internal organs. Same thing.
Maybe they can get drunk and her mom can say, "dear, no one is telling you this, but your eyebrows are creepy. You can pluck underneath where they start, you know." Then they will hug it out. Because for real, those brows kill me. And they are orange.
i'm sure nobody here ever drank before they were 21 right? i can't hate on this chick for drinking because i was doing the same thing when i was her age. as long as she's not driving after drinking i have no problem with it.
Yeah, I started drinking when I was 19. Hey, its legal in Canada and Canada is only 20 minutes away. Then you know, came the esctasy, cocaine, etc. etc. before I was even 21. I'm sure she'll be fine. The Olsens turned out alright.
(that last comment was dripping with sarcasm) I know not everyone goes down the same path, but its a lot easier in Hollywood.
I drank when I was underage too but Mom didn't buy me the booze.
my mom drank with me when i was underage. the rule was if you're going to drink it's going to be with me and you're not allowed to leave the house until the next day. it wasn't an everyday thing, maybe once or twice a month but it kept me from going out and getting drunk with a bunch of my friends.
FREEDOM BELIVE IN IT LIVE IT
16 IS ADULT IN SOME CASES 14
Chelsea, we don't live in a third world country.
Not yet atleast*
Chelsea, lots of child fuckers say the same thing, "she may be thirteen, but she is mature, practically an adult."
in other words no freedom. your currency tells me its a third country.
just remenber when you were 16
I remember when I was 16. What's the point? I think of it like drunk driving. Can some people drive pretty well while being above the legal limit? Maybe like .001%. Does that mean the law should be scrapped? Hell, no. Likewise most kids are dumb. Should the laws be scrapped for those who aren't? Nope.
Anyways, how are you defining freedom? No one is free in the anarchist sense of the word. It is part of living in society that you trade some freedoms for protections. No one is really free, and that is pretty awesome. Although, I would get to sterilize anyone I wanted without worry of jail time. Hmmmm, maybe I should reconsider my stance on this…
that's all i ever hear please protect me 'protect me from smokers (BUT I WILL DRIVE MY CAR) protect me from hot coffee, companys,
countrys, weather, protect my schools , house,
and so on nanny state at it's best
I drank but we got the alcohol the hard way. Actually, I don't remember how we got it but we'd all chip in and I guess some pervy perv would buy it for us.
I wouldn't get it for my kids and I won't give them permission. But I know how the brain of a determined teenager works. We'll just see if I can remember all my old tricks so I can spot them.
BE RESPONSIBALE FOR OWN LIFE BE SMART AND TEACH YOUR CHILDREN TO BE THE SAME. THAT'S FREEDOM.
(you use to be albe to drink at 18 some states 16)
NEVER TRADE FREEDOM FOR PROTECTION
this coming from someone who does not even live in the good ole' US of A.
p.s.
THE EURO HAS DROPPED IN VALUE TOO! HMPH!
I think she's just getting all of this stuff from t-shirts. There must be a hot topic nearby.
Chelsea, you are too trusting. I don't trust other people to teach their kids not to be asshats. Or the parents not to act like morons themselves. Your freedoms end where mine begin, and if that means you have to control yourself, and the state needs to ensure that you control yourself - so be it.
A nanny state isn't the same as not having unfettered freedom.
How about this, you move to someplace where people can do whatever they want, whenever they want. When you get robbed or raped, that sucks, but at least everyone gets to drink, right?
Anyways, I believe a legal limit is freedom. For me, anyways. Freedom from idiot kids around in bars.
€1.46=$1.00 IS HARDLY A DROP
IT'S A WORLD MARKET THE DOLAR DROP AGAIST THE CLONE IN COSTA RICA BY 5% IN LAST YEAR 1ST TIME IN HISTORY
HIGHEST MURDER RATE, HIGHEST ASSAULT, USA.
I'M NOT ANTI AMERICAN I JUST BELIEVE IN FREEDOM
And that helps your argument how? That the USA, arguably more permissive than, say, North Korea, has a higher murder and assault rate? Isn't that an argument FOR more rules?
Also, I would just like to bring up that those are reported crime rates, many crimes, here and abroad, go unreported. What about Mexico? You think when gangsters were almost wiping out whole villages and selling the young girls into prostitution it was reported? Furthermore, bullshit.
Issues like freedome are never simple and cannot be reduced to simple slogans.
And by "freedome", I of course mean "freedom."
USA IS NOT MORE PERMISSIVE. LESS FREEDOMS MORE RULES THAN MOST PLACES I HAVE BEEN TO ,IT DOES NOT SEEM TO HELP
OH NO THE SPELLING POLICE I BROKE A RULE , PLEASE DON'T ARREST ME OR FINE ME
I was correcting myself. Also, what do you mean by rules? Governmental rules? Are you even condsidering societal rules that are enforced by societal pressure or mobs? I think your idea of permissive is pretty superficial and your idea of freedoms fairly localized. For freedoms you don't have in the US versus, say Australia or Japan or China, I would wager you have at least one that those countries don't have.
WAKE UP RULES ARE NOT TO PROTECT YOU THEY ARE TO CONTROL YOU. LIKE BEING YOUR OWN SPELLING POLICE
GOOD LUCK TO YOU IF YOU FEEL YOUR FREE . YOUR FREE
Um, spelling police? Are you serious. Having standards is not a form of control if they are self-imposed. Do you not shit in a toilet? If you do, you are being controlled (by your logic).
Honestly, I don't know where you get this canned ham idea that rules, or control, are inherently bad. Or that humans are inheriently good enough to control themselves. In both cases, they are not.
All these CAPS…is "chelsea" actually Cord or Whitney, trying to rile us up? Who makes these statements for real?
Also, Hayden's current irritating behavior is retroactive. I couldn't watch Remember the Titans over the weekend because I knew what she would turn into.
chelsea: I am going out for a bit. But if you really want to discuss this do me a favor. Tell me what exactly you mean by freedom and free. It seems like a simple task, but I find it hard. Anyhow, I need to know your definition to make sure I am getting your point correctly.
I DO KATE . AND WE A CAP RULE IN PLACE.LISA I BELIEVE PEOPLE ARE GOOD RULES ARE BAD. AND I THINK YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT FREEDOM IS.
Ohhhh, we a cap rule in place. Gotcha, all clear now.
MY POINT EXACTLY
WE HAVE A CAP RULE IN PLACE. FOR THOSE THAT NEED IT SPELLED OUT FOR THEM
i gez a disyre for intelijint p0sts iz juuus stooopid.
I HEAR YOU ALSO MAKE FUN OF THE BLIND, AND KICK DOGS
I GET IT NOW THAT'S YOUR IDEA OF FREEDOM
kate… english isn't chelsea's first language. Unless your Spanish is flawless, please cut her some slack on spelling.
Sorry, maybe I was a bit harsh.
I for one am used to all caps from Chelsea now. It is endearing to me.
I missed you chelsea!
You are certainly making me laugh out loud on all the threads today!! :-)
THANKS QUEEN I MISSED BEING HERE WITH YOU GUYS. I WAS IN MEXICO CITY BUYING FOR THE STORE
So, you don't want to discuss it? Cool. Maybe next time don't be so dismissive. Freedom is one of the things I have actually thought a lot about and studied. Just because I don't agree with your definition or agree that unrestrained freedom is best, doesn't mean I have no idea what it is.
I can't even punctuate correctly. Luckily I don't make a living with my bad spelling and punctuation. I'd be a broke as woman. Woooo man.
LISA YOU WANT CONTROL, BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHATS BEST FOR ME AND EVERYONE ELSE. THE FREEDOM TO CONTROL. YOU SHOULD THINK HARDER ABOUT THIS.
YOUR ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE TO KNOWING WHAT FREEDOM IS.
MY LIFE IS MINE. WHEN YOU KNOW THIS YOU REALIZE WHAT FREEDOM IS
YOUR LIFE IS YOURS(ONLY YOURS) NOW THATS FREEDOM
I HAVE TO GO TALK TO YOU TOMORROW
WHAT? SHE'S NOT SAYING ANYTHING REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT. YOU AREN'T EVEN TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE IS WRITING. FREEDOM ISN'T ACTING ON EVERY THOUGHT AND DESIRE YOU HAVE. THAT WOULD BE GLUTTONY, YOU KNOW, OVERINDULGENCE.
FREEDOM COMES WITH RESPONSIBILITY AND FREEDOM ISN'T EVERY MAN OR WOMAN FOR THEMSELVES. BEING RESPONSIBLE IN SOCIETY IS NOT BEING CONTROLLED. FOLLOWING THE LAW ISN'T CONFORMING.
YOU CAN HAVE FREEDOM AND FOLLOW RULES. .
What are you talking about? I pretty much didn't say anything that you just said I believed. Now I am getting pissed. Don't talk out your ass, Chelsea.
I want the freedom to control? Well by your logic I should have it. Because we should all be able to do what we want, without the impediment of government. What I was saying is that I want freedom FROM control, usually from the tryanny of the masses, sometimes the government, but always with the realization (as I said above) that my rights end where yours begin.
I am actually quite anti-government restriction. Freedom, true freedom, however, is not just freedom from government. To me, it is also freedom from others. That construct necesssarily requires a governing body to protect my rights against others - given that this is not a utopia and I believe people are intrinsicaly selfish. If there isn't some sort of governing body you are reduced to a "might makes right" sort of society, which I believe stifles any sort of progress. If I need to "control" you by calling the cops when you try to steal my t.v., I don't believe it is anti-freedom to do so. If I need to tell the block that you killed my cat so they exercise societal pressure on you so you don't kill anyone else's cat, I don't think it is anti-freedom to do that either. THAT is why I asked you for your definitions. That is why I tried to see exactly what you were saying before I jumped on you. Instead I will do the human, selfish, thing and just say that your ethos is made up of bumper-stickers, superfical and clearly not thought out. I don't know if it is a language thing, or you are trying to be rude, but either way let me tell you this: I am not dumb, please don't treat me as if I were.
I LOVE CAPS
Mr. Monkey Bottoms may be the best name for a cat since Mrs. Pickles.
Lisa is my new hero. *adds her to myspace heroes list along with Butrous Butrous Gali, Boris Yeltzin and the guy who invented post-it notes."
I was going to make a political comment in response to Lisa the … and then I remembered I was on a celebrity gossip website.
Oh, sorry. Back to Hayden's eyebrows. Those suckers are steeee-range!
Mr. Monkey Bottoms would also be a really hot name for porn.
That dress Hayden is wearing is not so flattering.
Yes, mae, Lisa is my hero, too. I have been ENJOYING the wordsmith talent that we like to call Lisa.
If she becomes an attorney, (she should really think about this long and hard) she can really help people and make TONS of money. I am old and I can spot talent.
Think about it, Lisa, that's all. ( I had to go to google today to look up Ignoble. Did you mean the hawk with short wings or humble rank/not noble?)
:-)
Hahah, mr. monkeybottoms porn. Why didn't *I* think of that??
as i said you don't know what freedom is. just be a good little citizen.your losted.talking out my ass statment shows me more about you than you could possilby know.
Oh, please. You say things, with no proof or basis in fact. You haven't addressed any points I made OR elucidated any of yours. And you are talking out your ass, or, better put, talking about something you really haven't thought about. But excuse me for getting exasperated. I seem to recall you were quick to ask for a break back when you complained about personal attacks and then used them. Next time I will be sure to do as you say, not as you do (/sarcasm).
You accuse, you ignore, you refuse to explain and you belittle. I guess it was my fault for expecting an actual conversation and for thinking I could learn something from you.
Maybe you should just stick to ramming Amy and your pro-ana lifestyle down everyone's throat. I will even let how hypocritical that given your position on freedom and "rules."
a know it all can't learn anything. i think you would hit me if you could. i don't belittle i dismiss. talk to your self then your have someone that agrees with you all the time.
where's all this anger comming from? relax
I am not angry. I am super dissapointed. But that is what you do, isn't it? Make things up. Project. Did you really just say I was the sort of person who would punch you for disagreeing? Like I am some sort of animal who can't control herself? It is just as I said, you make things up, and it is sad.
I am not a know-it-all. If you look above you will see that I asked you specific questions. You brought up points, I brought up contradictory points which you refused to address. I like to discuss. I believe people can ultimately disagree, but still learn from eachother in the process of civil discourse.
But that is ok, call me a know-it-all. Result to personal attacks, insult all you want.
You don't dismiss, that implies you have actually considered what the other person has said. You ignore because you can't handle anything that may put a crack in your reality.
your kidding right
Kidding about what? Nevermind, I know I can't expect you to actually explain or back up anything you say.
you have a anger in your writing. for what ever reasons you don't like me. thats ok. i couldn't type, express, or spell well to give a detail opinion on this subject. it would take me all day,
this all started when i said 16 is adult this set you off.
that took me 8 mins to type
how long would it take me to type a true opinion
Just because I strongly disagree, doesn't mean I am angry. Certaily not angry enough for physical violence. To say that is disrespectful and insulting.
It started after the 16 comment? No, not at all. My post after that was light hearted and ended with a joke. I don't know if it is a language thing or you are projecting, but either way, it isn't my fault. I didn't start to get exasperated until #33, and then at #35, I dialed it back and wanted to discuss it nicely. You came back with an insult.
I don't dislike you - as a matter of fact I was one of the few people way back when who said so. I can disagree with people and not hate them, or be angry. Mostly what I am feeling is annoyance.
Mira si quire, puede poner su opinion en espanol.
people are good . goverment is bad. laws that protect me from myself are bad. goverments job is to protect from thief, murder, assault. outside threats. and they can't do that very well because they they want to be everything to everyone.
world wide problem . every country wants control of everything. press, health ,movement, trade. plumming, building. it goes on + on. just list all the police, state .fbi dea, inspectors of all kind etc. that tells it all.
control is not freedom
Si se dice eso en el primer lugar, pudieramos discutir esta issue. Pero, en vez, me dio(accented o) que yo no se lo que es la liberdad y me insulto (accent over the o). Por que tengo preguntas. No es la uniqa que cree que la gobermeinto es largo y intrusive. Es una idea interestante - y al puntos, creo que nos acordamos. Pero no podemos aprendar las otras sin discutimos. Y todos las preguntas no son attaques.
Y mi pregunta es la misma que pregunte(accented e) en la primera vez: que es la liberdad? Como se definie la palabra? Por que hay muchos definiciones para esa palabra, y la liberdad de yo, no es necessariamente lo mismo que suyo.
mimimal govement.
i don't like to switch back and fore spanish /english . the reason is not to interpert
but to think in english .
Pues, necesito practicar mi espanol. Si no tiene problemas, quiero escribir en espanol, y se puede escribir en ingles.
Pero, por otra tiempo - debo que trabajar.
ofcorse thats fine
I feel like giving you both a big hug. :-)
I CAN GO FOR A HUG