Soon we will be able to fill in the blanks on this R. Kelly mannequin!

Boooooo.

That's right. It's only a matter of time before the infamous R. Kelly kiddie porn tape hits the blog circuit. This questionable decision of the day comes from the judge in R. Kelly's child sex tape trial:

A judge will allow the public and the media to view a videotape in court that prosecutors allege shows singer R. Kelly having sex with an underage girl.

In his ruling Thursday, Judge Vincent Gaughan said he saw no "overarching interest" in banning the tape from public view.

"This is the whole crux and linchpin of the case," Gaughan said. "If there was no tape, we wouldn't have a case."

Kelly has pleaded not guilty to 14 counts of child pornography. Prosecutors claim the videotape was made sometime during a nearly three-year span between January 1998 and October 2000, when the girl may have been as young as 13.

No 'overarching interest' in banning the child sex tape. Who is this Honorable Judge Emotional Scarring Free For All? Something seems horribly wrong with that logic. At least he is a little worried that it may 'embarrass the girl' in the tape. No shit. Nothing ruins your junior year of college (the girl is supposedly 21 now) like all your friends watching a lecherous pop star pee on your 13-year-old self. I would know (whoa, kidding again, mom).

[Source]