Okay, I know, all of this newly open Angelina Jolie nonsense is just a clever marketing ploy for her new movie, but I'm shamelessly eating it all up. Here is the first part of her interview with Diane Sawyer and yes, it's slow, and sure, I suppose you could call it boring, but I can't help letting it make me feel a little warm and fuzzy inside. I mean, I'd rather get bozzy with mid-90s Angelina, but this Angie probably wouldn't make me tatto her name on my ass and become blood sisters.

Dec 16, 2006 · posted by molly · Link · 17 Responses
Related Posts

  • No related posts found.
  • Comments (17)

    No. 1 Jade says:

    First Bitches! Plus I love Angelina!!! Boo to Man-chin!!!

    Posted: Dec 16, 2006 at 9:18 pm
    No. 2 Sassy Ass says:

    Second bitches! lol I'm starting to like this couple for some reason!

    Posted: Dec 16, 2006 at 11:33 pm
    No. 3 joy lee says:

    YOU ARE RIGHT MOLLYGOOD, ITS ALL MARKETING PLOY FOR HER MOVIE. I HOPE NOBODY WILL WATCH THAT MOVIE! ANGELINA JOLIE IS FULL OF CRAP!!! SHE'S A HOMEWRECKER! STOLE SOMEONE'S HUSBAND AND TELLING THE WHOLE WORLD SHE'S VERY LUCKY TO HAVE A RAINBOW FAMILY, BEING WITH BRAD AND ALL THOSE "BS" SHE HAS NO CONSCIENCE AND JUST SIMPLY A FAKE SO CALLED HUMANITARIAN PERSON! I BET SHE CANNOT BE APPROVED TO ADOPT A KID HERE IN OUR COUNTRY, USA!!! ANGELINA GO AND LIVE IN AFRICA WHERE YOU BELONG! YOU CANNOT FOOL US AMERICANS!!! JUST REMEMBER — KARMA!!!

    FOR BRAD….HOPE YOU WILL REALIZED WHAT A BIG MISTAKE YOU MADE FOR CHOOSING ANGELINA!!! YUCK!!!

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 12:01 am
    No. 4 Celebrity girl says:

    I applaud Angelina's humanatarian efforts,but there is a time and place for everything.It would be nice to see her talk about the movie instead of basking in her own glory.

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 5:06 am
    No. 5 Drama Queen says:

    Another Oscar-worthy performance from Jolie. Call me a cynic, but this chick isn't convincing me that this is her "true" self. Time will tell, Mz. Goth with blood hanging around

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 6:21 am
    No. 6 anonymous says:

    -SHE HAS NO CONSCIENCE-

    Aint that the truth. First she marries her costar Johnny Lee Miller, then she cheats on him by fucking around with her next costar, the lesbian. Then she fucks around with her next costar, Billy Bob Thornton, steals him away from Laura Dern who he was engaged to marry. Then she starts fucking around with ANOTHER costar in Brad Pitt & steals him away from his wife. How she sleeps at night, I don't know. And I also dont know how her fans can possibly justify her behaviour that consists of constantly screwing/marrying her costars.

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 6:29 am
    No. 7 chunkstyle says:

    Hey guys, chill it out. If anyone were to steal my husband (and stay away bitches **brandishes broken bottle**), I'd want it to be Angie. I mean, c'mon! She is quite possibly the sexiest, most generous, open, loving, and good-role-choosing (okay, besides that stupid "Trading Lives" movie) lady in H'wood today! If I were Jennifer, I'd take it as a complement. Jen was married to the sexiest guy and Brad just finally met his soul and body mate…
    Loves it all, good H'wood drama.

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 2:00 pm
    No. 8 anonymous says:

    Did she tell Diane she was on the pill? Does anyone else think it's weird she's talking about her method of birth control?

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 3:51 pm
    No. 9 kat says:

    I agree with: SHE HAS NO CONSCIENCE statement…ESP. in her personal life. IF she HAD a CONSCIENCE, she may try reconciliation with her father while he is STILL alive! She is just WIERD…

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 4:28 pm
    No. 10 Shannon says:

    I know Angelina's well known for her humanatarian efforts and I think that's a wonderful thing.However,despite all the good things she's done for kids all over the world I wasn't always a fan I thought of her as kind of nutty.But this side of her makes me think differently.Now I'm wondering if she is in fact a genuinely nice person or one hell of an actress,either way hats off to Angelina.

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 9:43 pm
    No. 11 anonymous G says:

    blah, blah, blah

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 10:53 pm
    No. 12 Kat says:

    Mother Angelina and Saint Brad? Please give me a break.

    "Mercy can be of two kinds. It can be very egoistic, then it only appears as mercy but is not; unless mercy is absolutely egoless it is not authentic. And the difference is very subtle: from the outside there is no difference at all but one can feel the difference inside.

    If mercy arises out of your bliss then it can never be an ego trip. If you share your bliss you feel thankful to the person who receives it, you feel humble. Bliss never makes anybody egoistic; on the contrary, dropping of the ego is the basic requirement of being blissful. Unless one drops the ego one is never blissful. Bliss happens within you like a light, and mercy is the radiation of it. When your bliss starts reaching to others it is mercy, compassion.

    But the false and the pseudo coin which is cheaper to attain is also there. And that's what so many religious people go on doing–the Christian missionaries, et cetera. Their mercy is not out of joy, out of ecstasy; their mercy is a means. They are using mercy as a means of attaining something in this life or in the other life–but it is not an end.

    The person who is merciful towards the poor, the starving, the ill, and is using it as a means of attaining heaven, of attaining God's grace, is exploiting these people. In fact this type of man will never like the world without the poor, without the ill, without the starved, because where will he show his mercy then? And how will he attain to paradise:–his whole ladder to paradise is lost.

    So these people who go on serving the poor and the ill are the people who would like the poor and ill to remain forever. They would not like the world to be really happy because the happy person does not need your mercy. They would not like the pain to disappear totally, the suffering to be gone forever–then who will need you? Then you will feel absolutely futile. That was the meaning of your life; you were dependent on those people.

    …I don't teach any service to the poor and I don't teach any service to the ill and the starved. I only teach bliss, and if out of bliss service comes, it is beautiful. If out of bliss you start serving people, that is spontaneous; there is no goal in it, it is unmotivated. And when it is unmotivated it is beautiful.

    Just recently Mother Teresa got the Nobel Prize; everybody is praising her–and the whole thing is stupid! HOW she has contributed to world peace I am unable to understand. By serving the poor of Calcutta, the beggars and the widows and the orphans, how has she served world peace, the cause of peace? The poor of Calcutta are not the cause of world war. By serving them, by helping them to continue to live, the world war is not postponed. And by serving them the poverty is not destroyed either." — Baghwan Shree Rajneesh …And it goes on from there.

    Posted: Dec 17, 2006 at 11:25 pm
    No. 13 Drama Queen says:

    Huh? I mean seriously, what the F was that??? I think somebody macro'd one of their finals - an essay entitled "Huh?"… Dude, you just Cntrl V'd all over Molly's page.

    Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 12:03 am
    No. 14 kat says:

    Just so y'all know, it was NOT me cranking out the religious/spiritual stuff up on this post…I did post #9. I am "kat"–small "k"…This is a "Kat"–large "k". I just don't want you all to think I am going to ram my personal beliefs down your orifices…Peace and enjoy whatever holiday you choose to honor this season!

    Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 3:06 am
    No. 15 Katlyn says:

    Hey, the woman is so hot she sizzles and a good egg to match. What's not to like?

    Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 10:57 am
    No. 16 wtf says:

    WTF Kat - get over yourself. We are reading celebrity gossip because it's fun - "blissful" in fact - don't be a fun vacuum.

    Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 11:05 am
    No. 17 skinny_fat says:

    Angie had to sleep in a few hours because she had an interview to do? That's much more strenuous than caring for small children. She's beyond annoying.

    Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 11:33 am
    Leave a Comment

    It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

    Already have an account? Then log in!

    Scroll Posts