A Wal-Mart employee in Louisiana is in trouble with the feds for stealing a (technically) pornographic photo of Jamie Lynn Spears breast-feeding her child. There are just so many things wrong with this story, we don't know where to begin.

Jamie Lynn's fiance, Casey Aldridge, took your average I'm-a-new-teen-parent pictures on his digital camera and then ordered copies at his local Wal-Mart (of course), where one of the employees got a little too excited about a picture of a 17-year-old exposing her breast to feed a baby. This poses a problem for the creep because Jamie Lynn is a minor, and selling or buying pictures of this nature constitutes pornography. Oh, and then there's the whole issue of stealing Casey's photos.

Let this be a lesson to all of you: Don't get your photos developed at Wal-Mart. Also, don't be a pedophile.

[Source]

Sep 22, 2008 · posted by Whitney · Link · 47 Responses
Related Posts

• 12.05.08: Happy Trails, Friends or: Damn This Economy Right to the Hell from Whence It Emerged (Comments: 640)
• 12.05.08: Time To Say Goodbye (Comments: 113)
• 12.05.08: Celebrity Encounters (Comments: 15)
• 12.05.08: A 'Gossip Girl' Boy And His Facebook (Comments: 1)
• 12.05.08: OJ Simpson: Guilty, Finally (Comments: 6)

Comments (47)

No. 1 ilnazhad says:

OK, "redneck" is a word I think is racist.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:05 am
No. 2 say what? says:

That's just gross, and the employee should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:11 am
No. 3 poo says:

I heard banjos playing in the background while I read this thread.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:20 am
No. 4 Stoney says:

Um, DUH. Of course that employee would try to steal that pic. It's probably worth thousands of dollars. *sigh*

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:20 am
No. 5 Sarah says:

Um. Can the Spears' not afford a digital camera? It seems that, boob or no boob, there's not a lot of reason for them or anyone other than my Grandma to be getting pictures developed at Wal-Mart.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:22 am
No. 6 Stoney says:

Exactly, sarah. Especially when you're a celebrity relentlessly hounded for profitable pictures. They are fucking STOOPID.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:26 am
No. 7 hms says:

Makes you miss those great Polaroid cameras where you pull out the picture, turn it upside down and wait for it to develop in a minute or two.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:29 am
No. 8 Sarah says:

hms - that's a good point… Maybe the Spears' can't afford a digital camera, or aren't aware of them, but they have GOT to have a Polaroid laying around somewhere.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:32 am
No. 9 say what? says:

sarah, according to the post, it WAS a digital camera.

guess they can't afford a photo printer or photo paper? or they're just (thank you Stoney) STOOPID.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:33 am
No. 10 southiejpd says:

anyone who thinks the word redneck is racist is a redneck.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:40 am
No. 11 janice says:

Also, "redneck" refers to white people.

Whitney Little doesn't care about white people.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 11:52 am
No. 12 april says:

I'm unqaware of a redneck race.

Tasteless? Yes. Racist? No.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 12:06 pm
No. 13 Skaði says:

Redneck=White Trash

Sorta kinda racist, but I use the word all the time to describe the utterly witless morons that live in counties where I absolutely refused to look at houses.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 12:20 pm
No. 14 april says:

See now white trash is extraordinarily racists. Much along the lines of male slut. White trash, as opposed to just plain old trash implies that trash does not normally apply to white people.

Personally I think redneck can apply to any person of any color, creed, or regional background.

Po-dunk behavior.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 12:51 pm
No. 15 Sarah says:

Exactly, April. Here are some other terms along those lines:
Male prostitute
Male model
Male bimbo
Female truckdriver
Reverse racist (this one just never makes any sense to me.)
Oh, also, people who refer to a dad taking care of his kids as "babysitting" them.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 12:59 pm
No. 16 Sarah says:

Oh. "Lady cop," as well. I'm sure I'll come up with more.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:00 pm
No. 17 oilybohunk7 says:

So now white trash is racist against other ethnicities because by disparaging a Caucasian person by calling them white trash it is implying that trash is normally a different race? I think we are really stretching for reasons to feel righteously indignant. White trash is absolutely a derogatory term but if it is to be labeled racist I really feel it would be against Caucasians and not every other race on the planet but the one actually being disparaged.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:03 pm
No. 18 deimos says:

poor whitney. i know she didn't sign up for a race debate when she was writing this. i'm a white person from the south and i do not find redneck offensive. when i hear redneck i think of a person who says "fer" instead of "for". they also have a mangy dog and a car that doesn't work in their front yard. this person could be any color. this person is a redneck because they take pride in being ignorant. this person likes the fact that they are called a redneck.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:23 pm
No. 19 April says:

its an insult to that person to call them trash.. but why specify the white? What in white trash is racist to whites? If someone called me white trash they would be a) stating the obvious and b) calling me trash. White trash does not disparage white people - i mean unless that statement actually means white people are trash because they are white. However having to precede trash with white because the person is white, yea i think that implies that trash is automatically assumed to be not white.

when you call a guy a male slut you imply that a slut is a woman unless otherwise preceded with male. I apply the same to white trash.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:24 pm
No. 20 Sarah says:

oilybohunk7, you know I love you, but is it possible that maybe you misunderstood what April was saying? Because you've come off a little argumenty, but I think you and she are basically making the same point.
Am I wrong?

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:38 pm
No. 21 oilybohunk7 says:

I said "if" it were to be labeled racist. I don't feel that it should be labeled racist. Not towards any race. I would be more likely to label it as elitist or classist because more often than not it is used in reference to those of low socioeconomic standing. I'm not spoiling for a fight or looking to offend anyone that is just my opinion, for what it is worth, which might be nothing.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:40 pm
No. 22 AngiePangie says:

This thread is getting a little heated but I just figured I would throw in my two cents–if you get digital pics developed from WalMart, you bring your memory card in, stick it into the computer, select the pics you want from the computer, then WalMart does the printing for you in about an hour. They're cheap and pretty good quality.
HOWEVER–if I was a (quasi)celebrity/romantic interest of a celebrity, I would NOT bring pictures of that celebrity, pornographic or not, to a WalMart. Okay, end of my two cents.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:43 pm
No. 23 oilybohunk7 says:

Sarah I see your point. Sorry to you and April if I came off bitchy, I didn't really mean to. Different terms affect different people in different ways. I can admit that I'm not the best judge of that because very few terms offend me even the dreaded "C" word that gets most woman so heated.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:46 pm
No. 24 janice says:

oilybohunk, (I love writing that) I do agree that it (redneck) is mostly a classist term. They etymology of the word is that it was originally used to refer to white people of lower socio-economic status who did manual labour in the sun for a living, thereby sunburning their necks. I don't think the issue there is that they're white, it's that they're poor.

The whole white trash debate, however, I'm undecided on. April, you make some good points. Oilybohunk, I see where you're coming from. Let's meet in the middle for some marshmallow sandwiches and Mountain Dew.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:48 pm
No. 25 Skaði says:

Is it really possible for me, as a white person, to be racist when I'm calling other white people rednecks? Perhaps it's just around here that we only call white people rednecks, I don't know. Anyway, I'm not disparaging them for their color, obviously. Many of them use the term to decribe themselves with pride. I would define a redneck as willfully uneducated. Someone who would put themselves into debt to score Nascar tickets. Their favorite forms of entertainment are wrestling, racing, monster truck rallies, and pop country. They hate books. These are my own observations, and since I have a strong distaste for this kind of person it's only derogatory because I don't like those personality traits. Since they like themselves, to them redneck is not a bad word. It's all subjective.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:50 pm
No. 26 Stoney says:

Maybe we should just start saying black trash, Indian trash, Asian trash, Mexican trash, and Eskimo trash *coughsarahpalin* to make white trash feel better?

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:50 pm
No. 27 janice says:

Can I be Polar Trash?

We could be like a new generation Spice Girls.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:54 pm
No. 28 Skaði says:

As far as the origin of the word, it is also linked to union coal miners' red bandanas.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:55 pm
No. 29 oilybohunk7 says:

Janice, I'm all in for some marshmallow sandwiches and some Dew. :)

Skaoi, you just described at least 50% of the people in my home town! I'm not a fan either. I'll never forget going to my first "Greater Galesburg Day" - a celebration of my wonderful city. I saw a pale, shirtless guy with a Bud Light in one hand, a ciggie in the other, wearing stonewashed Wrangers and a mullet leaning against a rusted-out ancient Camaro. What a sight to be seen.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:56 pm
No. 30 Stoney says:

No janice, Sarah Palin has the role of Polar Trash! Uterus Hating Wolf Stalking Rape Profiteering Polar Trash!

Teehee.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 1:59 pm
No. 31 janice says:

Bwa ha ha!

Fine, if I can't be Polar Trash, I will settle for being Polar Fleece. That stuff is warm, soft and durable, and very popular around here right now. It's friggin freezing.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:05 pm
No. 32 April says:

madam vice president, polar trash. i like it.

oh and oily? we are cool.

end result, i dont think redneck can be racist.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:05 pm
No. 33 oilybohunk7 says:

Sounds good to me April.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:09 pm
No. 34 Stoney says:

Polar Fleece is a good one. But make sure it's Patagonia. I heard they tried to distance themselves from Sarah Palin and would not endorse her campaign just because she wears their label a lot. Patagonia rocks.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:10 pm
No. 35 Stoney says:

*that didn't read right.

Patagonia won't endorse her campaign because they disagree with her stance on issues, not because she wears their shit too much.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:12 pm
No. 36 janice says:

Ew, how much do you want to wager Bristol will name her child Patagonia?

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:29 pm
No. 37 Broomstick says:

racist? stfu, dumbass.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 2:41 pm
No. 38 rumour has it says:

Anyways, back to the breastfeeding picture snafu.

Man, I don't know why everyone wants to take pictures of that stuff. My sister in-law's brother and his wife took photos of the birth of their daughter and all that shit and then SENT it to us! AAAAHHHHH! Why would you let your husband send pictures of you butt naked to his own father. It's so weird. Oh and they live in Europe by the way so none of this redneckery business.

I think a lot of people do that when they have a baby no matter what "race" you are. If you want to take photos of the miracle of birth and the miracle of breastfeeding, then keep those photos PRIVATE and don't share them with me.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 3:53 pm
No. 39 Kitchy says:

I have tons of breastfeeding pictures but I don't send them to people. I have professional shots done (my husband is a photographer) in their albums, but not on the walls. I don't think it's weird to take pictures of such a bonding moment. Anyone's welcome to look at my albums when they visit.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 4:03 pm
No. 40 Stoney says:

What's the problem? My mama flopped out her udder at the zoo and fed me while other visitors got snapshots.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 4:27 pm
No. 41 magnet says:

I was always fond of the term "cracker." Certainly there are no racist tones in this word, right??

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 4:55 pm
No. 42 Sarah says:

No. Especially if it is a Ritz and has some combination of Lipton onion dip, Cheez Whiz, and Spam atop of it.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 5:43 pm
No. 43 April says:

i like ritz plain. i like to lick the salt off them.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 5:49 pm
No. 44 sar says:

who, janice?? oh wait do you mean Whittle Little?

All the racist crap aside (ignoring the whole "if they like it it's ok" mess) I want to say that this is an outrage. Wal-Mart will fuck up your pics EVERY SINGLE TIME. That's why ever since I became a fulltime creepy dude, I invested in a darkroom. Trust me people, there's nothing like watching a boob appear out of nothing in a tub of chemicals, in the comfort of your own home, where you can wear anything you like such as a tiger costume with the butt cut out.

Posted: Sep 22, 2008 at 10:19 pm
No. 45 Sarah says:

Oh dear god HANGING CHAD RIGHT HERE @44 FOR SAR PLEASE. sar, I am sending you my "Oops I Crapped My Pants" bill.

Posted: Sep 23, 2008 at 12:38 am
No. 46 janice says:

Sar, I have to hit the hard-hitting questions: Do you have an assless tiger costume?

And also, side note: one time I delivered my pictures to Walmart for developing. I was quite young, probably 11. My pictures were of a fun birthday party scenario. I was returned pictures of a naked man and his wang. Ergo, my question is, what the fuck is up with Walmart photo developers?

Posted: Sep 23, 2008 at 12:44 am
No. 47 sar says:

Oh, ladies, so many questions must go unanswered until my Little Lord Faunterloy costume order goes through at John Galliano.

Posted: Sep 23, 2008 at 9:31 am
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

Scroll Posts